Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Stagecoach Bars available at Tea Party Silverby Allan Seccombe
November 13, 2009

ADVANCES in technology, increasing focus on reducing human interaction with bacteria, and tracking goods and people are all good news for silver and the price of the industrial metal, which has lagged for so long, says Jessica Cross, CEO of VM Group.

Long regarded as the poor cousin of gold, the metal, which is mainly used in industrial applications as well as to make jewelry, has bright prospects, with off take in a spectrum of new products put at just below 350 million ounces by 2020 (see graph below), Cross argued in a presentation at the LBMA Conference earlier this month.

The silver price is currently trading around $17.30/oz, (TP Note: at today’s pricing 11/23/09, make that $18.60 ± ) a level that it traded around in the first half of 2008 when it broke up to just shy of $21. These two spikes were unparalleled, certainly since 1985, with the metal touching slightly north of $8.50 just once since then.

 Looking at the history of the silver market, Cross said about two thirds of the mined metal is a by-product of other minerals like copper, gold and lead, making it difficult to determine a price at which silver production would fall in a natural supply and demand scenario. Being a by-product, the metal will come onto the market almost regardless what the price is for it.

One of the major users of silver, the photographic film sector, is being particularly hard hit as consumers turn to digital cameras. A graph of silver demand by the sector shows a steady decline since a peak above 200 million ounces in the early 1990s to well below 150 million ounces in 2009.

Another anchor on silver prices, which tend to take direction from the waxing and waning gold price, is that a lot of silver used in a range of applications – like photographic film, electronics and batteries — tends to be recycled, bringing back about 400 million ounces a year of the metal to the market.

But the days of huge recycling could be drawing to an end, Cross said, pointing to a host of technological advances needing silver, including wound care, food hygiene and water, wood preservatives, textiles, solar panels and radio frequency identification tags.

“These new end uses for silver are set to pick up the demand slack left by the shrinking photographic industry,” she said. “But, unlike photographic film, these end users do not generate vast amounts of recycled metal. In general… the metal is going to be taken off the market for good.”

Silver’s time has come, she said.

“The change is coming about as a result of silver’s unique properties as a biocide as well as is superior conductivity,” she said.

“The interesting thing is that many of the world’s worries and woes today are playing right into the hands of silver and this metal appears to be in the right place at the right time in a number of applications.”

Radio frequency identification tags, used in identity documents, passports and stock controls, are growing in use. China, for example is spending $6B to install these devices in identity documents for all its citizens and in transport tickets, she said.

London-based metals consultancy VM Group estimates use of these tags will grow to more than 30 billion by 2020 from around seven billion now. Each tag contains about 10 milligrams of silver on average, absorbing nine million ounces of silver from the 2.3 million ounces currently.

Solar panels and mirrors could absorb another 50 million ounces by 2020 compared to 18 million ounces now. Wood preservative coatings could account for up to 100 million ounces a year as chromate copper arsenic, the existing wood preservative is phased out.

There were no estimates of the amount of silver that could be used in plasters and bandages, which use silver for its anti-bacterial properties. These properties also feed into the clothing and textile sector where body odors and bacteria are eliminated.

Silver is also used in water purification devices and to store food. It could take up around 95 million oz by 2020.

“Superimpose this good news on the tonnages of silver that have gone into the ETFs (silver-backed exchange-traded funds) and you have an underlying strength within this market to justify its current price strength,” Cross said.

The gold:silver ratio is expected to narrow. At current prices you can buy 64.4 ounces of silver for the price of a single ounce of gold.

“The current market conditions indicate that gold has become overpriced and silver has become underpriced, suggesting there will be a shift in assets from gold to silver,” said Jeffrey Lewis, who edits Silver-coin-investor.com.

 “Since 1970, the ratio of the number of ounces of silver you could buy with one ounce of gold has run as high as 80:1 and as low as 20:1, with a mean of 54:1. Today’s ratio is moderately higher than 54:1; in fact, the ratio is nearing 64:1, suggesting that there will be a correction in either the price of gold, or silver will advance to make up the deficit,” he said.

US Mint Suspends Sale of 2009 Gold & Silver Eagles
Mary Beth at Tea Party silver
November 29, 2009
 

If, like me, you have been watching the spot price of gold and silver lately you would be seeing that your investments in silver have been growing. One of the first things I do every morning is check the spot prices… Naturally, this is something I need to keep on top of throughout the day so that TPS can keep our pricing structure current… but as a fellow silver investor and co-owner now of a gold mining operation, I have a vested interest in watching what is going on.
 

In the last week we’ve seen gold almost reach the $1200 mark… and silver came close to $19. The first thing that this triggers in my mind is the question: “Okay… What’s happening out there?” This, then prompts me to go digging for articles, research, commentary by the experts to tell me what has impacted the pricing spikes or drops (as the case may be). Much of what I discover in this process I bring to the TP Newsletter to keep YOU informed …
 

One of the things that happened this week is that the US Mint has suspended the sale of gold and silver American Eagles. Several people have called me to ask about this. But, before I go further though let me pontificate a little about the issue of numismatic values compared to investment values of precious metals, because this will have a bearing on understanding the rest of this article.
 

Numismatics, according to Wikipedia, is “is the study or collection of currency, including coins, tokens, paper money, and related objects.” So when we speak of ‘numismatic value’ we aren’t necessarily only talking about precious metals.
 

Numismatic values are driven by many factors besides the metal content itself. The following is a list of some of those factors: 

  • Year of production
  • Design quality
  • Condition of the coin/currency at the time of valuation (circulated, uncirculated, scratches, dents, dings, corrosion etc.)
  • Minting errors
  • Socio-political events
  • Rarity
  • Quality – proof or burnished

Any or all of these factors can drive up the cost /value of a coin/currency from a collector’s vantage point. Contrast this from an investor’s vantage point. An investor is looking to purchase a commodity of value at the lowest possible cost with the highest possible value to hold until it increases in value, or is able to be leveraged in some way to his/her advantage. In the case of precious metals as one such commodity, the numismatic issues listed above are of little consequence because

  1. They drive up the costs artificially and  
  2. The value of the metal itself as a commodity is what is important.

Having said that, however, the investor market still holds room for personal preference as to design features and other meanings specific to investor preferences.

So let’s move on to discussing what’s going on with the US Mint. Keep in mind that the Gold and Silver Eagles are Legal Tender (howbeit greatly undervalued with a face value of $1 for silver and $50 for gold).1. As a government institution, the US Mint production of silver and gold products is dependent upon the annual allocation by the Treasury of precious metals purchased under their annual budget. This is a fixed, finite, amount (contrary to private mints or commercial entities that just purchase more when they run out).

  

In the last 2 years, 2008, & 2009, the US Treasury allocated LESS silver / gold than in previous years to their Silver Eagles program. This has several implications:

  • Silver/Gold Eagles for these years will be rarer than in previous years.
  • With current investment demand being higher due to the economic climate, there will be shortages.
  • The US Mint sales currently top 25,000,000 for 2009.
  • Because of the shortages, the short-term pricing will carry a higher premium (over spot). This is basic market economics.

2. In 2008, the US Mint also had to suspend sales of the gold & silver American Eagles. I had just begun investing in them in the fall of 2008… and I ran into this very issue myself last year. (Remember, the Treasury had cut back supply of metals in 2008 as well.)

3. Just because the US Mint has suspended sales does NOT mean that you cannot obtain these coins elsewhere from sellers who have had the foresight to stock up or vendors who are resellers for the US mint. But, bear in mind the following:

  • Buyers will pay a higher premium
  • Buyers will find they may have to wait extended periods of time for delivery after paying for their coins.

The US Mint may produce a few more of the 2009 Eagles yet before the close of the year. On the other hand, they may just be trying to regulate the rate at which they deplete the remaining supply. Since we are approaching the end of 2009, this isn’t too alarming because 2010 is just around the corner; new allocations for the next year will be in place and they will begin minting the 2010 Silver and Gold American Eagles and the cycle begins again.

I do have a source of limited supply for circulated Silver American Eagles from time to time. These will have scratches or small dings, and perhaps need cleaning up if you want to get them in pristine shape… But the premiums are lower and they’re still Eagles if you’re a real American Eagles fan… If you’re interested, drop me a note and I’ll watch for the next stock available in these…

I do still have sources for obtaining Eagles after our current inventory is depleted; however, I, too, will be subject to these higher premiums; so if and when that time comes, I may need to decide not to carry them due to the price point we will have to charge for them. After all, my mindset is more of an investor than collector… and I will want to keep as much of the commodity on hand as possible and not waste precious resources on artificially inflated premiums. Having said that, if you still want Eagles, drop me a note or call, and I’ll be happy to see what I can do… generally speaking, however, know that there will probably be minimum order volumes imposed upon me by my vendors…generally, those are 500 or more coins.

Things to Come for Tea Party Silver

On another note… I’ve shared with you in the past that we will be minting a new 1 Troy oz, .999 fine silver divisible bar (similar to the Stagecoach bars we now carry) … we are still in waiting mode on this, but I will give you a sneak preview of the artwork… I had hoped these would be ready for Christmas, but it doesn’t look like we’re going to make production in time. I will definitely be sending out a note when they come off the production line. Our first run will be in silver; later in the year after we get supply of gold running from the mine, we intend to produce these in 1 oz gold as well.This design is obviously inspired by our Alaska mining venture, but also takes its text from Zechariah 13:9 in Scripture.

“This third I will bring into the fire; I will refine them like silver and test them like gold. They will call on my name and I will answer them; I will say, ‘They are my people,’ and they will say, ‘The LORD is our God.’” 

We felt this text brings together the concept of how adversity distills character as well as references the challenges we are all facing in these turbulent times, which many believe to be ‘last days’ scripture talks about. We also felt that it instills hope in what the future holds and a sense of direction that we need to be taking as individuals and as a country.

Contact us at silver@teapartysilver.org
888-203-2232 x 1

from http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=13701

Global Research, May 22, 2009
US Association of Physicians calls for Moratorium on GMO Foods

 The American Academy of Environmental Medicine (AAEM) has just issued a call for an immediate moratorium on Genetically Manipulated (GMO) Foods.

In a just-released position paper on GMO foods, the AAEM states that ‘GM foods pose a serious health risk’ and calls for a moratorium on GMO foods. Citing several animal studies, the AAEM concludes ‘there is more than a casual association between GMO foods and adverse health effects’ and that ‘GM foods pose a serious health risk in the areas of toxicology, allergy and immune function, reproductive health, and metabolic, physiologic and genetic health.’ The report is a devastating blow to the multibillion dollar international agribusiness industry, most especially to Monsanto Corporation, the world’s leading purveyor of GMO seeds and related herbicides.

 In a press release dated May 19, the American Academy of Environmental Medicine, which describes itself as ‘an international association of physicians and other professionals dedicated to addressing the clinical aspects of environmental health,’ called immediately for the following emergency measures to be taken regarding human consumption of GMO foods:

   * A moratorium on GMO food; implementation of immediate long term safety testing and labelling of GMO food.

    * Physicians to educate their patients, the medical community and the public to avoid GMO foods.

    * Physicians to consider the role of GMO foods in their patients’ disease processes.

    * More independent long term scientific studies to begin gathering data to investigate the role of GMO foods on human health.

 The AAEM chairperson, Dr Amy Dean notes that ‘Multiple animal studies have shown that GM foods cause damage to various organ systems in the body. With this mounting evidence, it is imperative to have a moratorium on GM foods for the safety of our patients’ and the public’s health.’ The President of the AAEM, Dr Jennifer Armstrong stressed that ‘Physicians are probably seeing the effects in their patients, but need to know how to ask the right questions. The most common foods in North America which are consumed that are GMO are corn, soy, canola, and cottonseed oil.’ The AAEM’s position paper on Genetically Modified foods can be found at http:aaemonline.org.

 The paper further states that Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) technology ‘abrogates natural reproductive processes, selection occurs at the single cell level, the procedure is highly mutagenic and routinely breeches genera barriers, and the technique has only been used commercially for 10 years.’

The AAEM paper further states, ‘several animal studies indicate serious health risks associated with GM food consumption including infertility, immune dysregulation, accelerated aging, dysregulation of genes associated with cholesterol synthesis, insulin regulation, cell signalling, and protein formation, and changes in the liver, kidney, spleen and gastrointestinal system.’

They add, ‘There is more than a casual association between GM foods and adverse health effects. There is causation as defined by Hill’s Criteria in the areas of strength of association, consistency, specificity, biological gradient, and biological plausibility. The strength of association and consistency between GM foods and disease is confirmed in several animal studies.’

 GMO is toxic

The AAEM paper should give grounds for official rethinking of the current quasi laissez faire regulatory stance to GMO in which the solemn word of the GMO seed companies such as Monsanto is regarded as scientifically valid proof of safety. The AAEM study is worth citing in detail in this regard:

‘Specificity of the association of GM foods and specific disease processes is also supported. Multiple animal studies show significant immune dysregulation, including upregulation of cytokines associated with asthma, allergy, and inflammation.  Animal studies also show altered structure and function of the liver, including altered lipid and carbohydrate metabolism as well as cellular changes that could lead to accelerated aging and possibly lead to the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Changes in the kidney, pancreas and spleen have also been documented. A recent 2008 study links GM corn with infertility, showing a significant decrease in offspring over time and significantly lower litter weight in mice fed GM corn. This study also found that over 400 genes were found to be expressed differently in the mice fed GM corn. These are genes known to control protein synthesis and modification, cell signalling, cholesterol synthesis, and insulin regulation. Studies also show intestinal damage in animals fed GM foods, including proliferative cell growth and disruption of the intestinal immune system. ‘

The AAEM study also reviewed the biotechnology industry claims that GMO foods can feed the world through production of higher crop yields. It cited contrary evidence that the opposite appeared to be true, namely that over time GMO harvest yields were lower than conventional yields and required over time, more not less, highly toxic herbicidal chemicals such as glyphosate. The report noted, ‘The several thousand field trials over the last 20 years for genes aimed at increasing operational or intrinsic yield (of crops) indicate a significant undertaking. Yet none of these field trials have resulted in increased yield in commercialized major food/feed crops, with the exception of Bt corn.’ However, the slight yield gain for Bt corn they report was ‘largely due to traditional breeding improvements,’ and not to GMO.

They conclude that because GMO foods ‘pose a serious health risk in the areas of toxicology, allergy and immune function, reproductive health, and metabolic, physiologic and genetic health and are without benefit, the AAEM believes that it is imperative to adopt the precautionary principle, which is one of the main regulatory tools of the European Union environmental and health policy and serves as a foundation for several international agreements. The most commonly used definition is from the 1992 Rio Declaration that states: ‘In order to protect the environment, the precautionary approach shall be widely applied by States according to their capabilities. Where there are threats of serious or irreversible damage, lack of full scientific certainty shall not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation.’

Under intense public pressure, the German Minister of Agriculture recently issued a prohibition of planting for Monsanto MON810 GMO corn. Unfortunately, two weeks later she permitted planting of GMO potato seeds. Amflora, a genetically modified potato manufactured by chemicals giant BASF (a joint venture GMO partner of Monsanto), was declared by the German Ministry as posing ‘no danger for human health or the environment,’ The Ministry cited ‘in-depth examination’ and talks with scientific and economic experts as basis for the reckless decision.

The publication of the sensational critique of GMO by the American Academy of Environmental Medicine has been greeted with stone silence by most major US media and international press.

 GMO politics

 As I describe in great detail in my book, Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation, , GMO was released on the general public in the early 1990’s in the USA under an executive decision by then President George Herbert Walker Bush, reportedly following closed door meetings with leading Monsanto executives. President Bush mandated that there should be no special health and safety tests done by any US Government agency before releasing GMO for food consumption. It came to be known as the Doctrine of Substantial Equivalence.

 The US Government, on urging of Monsanto and the GMO lobby, further decided that labelling of a food product as ‘GMO free’ should be prohibited, using the vaguely formulated and entirely unscientific ‘doctrine’ proclaimed by President Bush in 1992, namely that GMO plants and non-GMO or ordinary plants were ‘substantially equivalent’ and hence needed no special testing before being released to the public.

 That Substantial Equivalence Doctrine, despite the fact that it directly contradicts the demand of the GMO companies for exclusive patent rights to their GMO seeds as being ‘unique’ and different from ordinary seeds, enabled Monsanto, Dow Chemicals, DuPont and other GMO patent holders to proliferate their products with no control. Most Americans naively believe that the Government Food and Drug Administration and US Department of Agriculture are there to make certain industrial food products are confirmed fully safe for human and for animal consumption before licensing.

 That de facto prohibition on labelling GMO foods has meant that most Americans have no idea how much of their daily diet from store-bought Corn Flakes to soybeans to corn and additives in every food on the supermarket shelf contained GMO contamination.

 Coincident with the mass introduction of GMO into the human and animal diet in the United States beginning the end of the 1990’s, there have been reported epidemic levels of allergic outbreaks in humans, strange diseases and numerous other health issues. The fact it is forbidden by Federal law to label GMO products means most health professionals are not even aware there might be any connection to a GMO diet for millions of Americans. The US population, since the 1992 ruling of President Bush—a ruling reaffirmed by presidents Clinton, George W. Bush and now by Barack Obama and his pro-GMO Secretary of Agriculture, Tom Vilsack—has been in effect treated as human guinea pigs in mass experimentation for substances never independently proven in long-term (ten years or longer) studies to be safe.    

It remains to be seen if the scientific critique of the AAEM is given the attention it warrants.

 

This is an interview w/ Adrian Douglas of http:.//www.marketforceanalysis.com and he is also the director of GATA. His work is proprietary and it measures the supply and demand in a particular market. The reading is the “force” for that market. The vast majority of the interview concerned Gold and Silver and in great detail. Adrian made some very interesting comments about Silver towards the end…

See video at http://www.thefinancialtube.com/video/3551/Interview-with-Adrian-Douglas-marketforceanalysiscom

Gold to $1650

Alf Fields tells Jim Sinclair: Gold to $1650
Posted by: “kevin” kevin.mckern@gmail.com spacerkev
Fri May 22, 2009 7:38 am (PDT)

From Yahoo Group “InvestorsExchange”

I bring to you the following with the specific permission of Alf Fields. I have suggested to you often in the past that once the price of gold reaches into its maximum potential it will not repeat the fall of the 1980s. I foresee gold re-entering the system in a new and unique form that does not include convertibility. It will not be tied to interest rates as it once was in its previous form. I have written to you various times about the Federal Reserve Gold Certificate ratio, modernized and revitalized, which now may well be associated with an SDR form of an International Central Bank. The tie between the ratio and gold would be a measure of international liquidity considered zero or 100 on the day of adoption.

The following is Alf’s statement yesterday, with his permission to post: “Gold cannot decline from its highs as it will be incorporated into the national and international monetary systems at that time.” –Alf Fields, May 20, 2009

Now do you have any questions why Fund Wizard Paulson just got long a few billion dollars worth of Gold ETFs and a few major gold producers? Finally a major event has taken place that is a US dollar milestone. The financing and extremely important event is the arrangement between China and Brazil displaces the dollar as China becomes the major trading partner with Brazil. Since then the Rial has been celebrating and the dollar has been depressed. This is a once in approximately a century replacement of a trading currency that has always meant a dethronement of the deposed and coronation of a new currency king. The last time this happened was when the US dollar supplanted the British Pound as the major trading currency and entity with Brazil 79 years ago. It took the Brits 300 years to supplant the Portuguese Escudo with the British Pound. Only twice has this occurred in 379 years. This is obscure to most but not to Mr. Paulson the hedge wizard. Obscure to most, but not to our gang at JSMineset. The dollar died in Rio and that means everywhere.\ The dollar is in for a very cold winter. There is one thing that is absolutely certain and that is Gold is now headed to at least $1650 and in all probability much higher. This is happening NOW! What more do you need to know?

from http://www.sfbayview.com/2009/you-are-being-lied-to-about-pirates/

by Johann Hari

Somali pirate “ships” are small, but the ships they seize are huge. They held one gigantic tanker for months until ransom was paid.

Who imagined that in 2009, the world’s governments would be declaring a new War on Pirates? As you read this, the British Royal Navy – backed by the ships of more than two dozen nations, from the U.S. to China – is sailing into Somalian waters to take on men we still picture as parrot-on-the-shoulder pantomime villains. They will soon be fighting Somalian ships and even chasing the pirates onto land, into one of the most broken countries on earth.

 

But behind the arrr-me-hearties oddness of this tale, there is an untold scandal. The people our governments are labeling as “one of the great menaces of our times” have an extraordinary story to tell – and some justice on their side.

Pirates have never been quite who we think they are. In the “golden age of piracy” – from 1650 to 1730 – the idea of the pirate as the senseless, savage thief that lingers today was created by the British government in a great propaganda heave. Many ordinary people believed it was false: Pirates were often rescued from the gallows by supportive crowds. Why? What did they see that we can’t?

In his book “Villains of All Nations,” the historian Marcus Rediker pores through the evidence to find out. If you became a merchant or navy sailor then – plucked from the docks of London’s East End, young and hungry – you ended up in a floating wooden Hell. You worked all hours on a cramped, half-starved ship, and if you slacked off for a second, the all-powerful captain would whip you with the cat o’ nine tails. If you slacked consistently, you could be thrown overboard. And at the end of months or years of this, you were often cheated of your wages.

Pirates were the first people to rebel against this world. They mutinied against their tyrannical captains – and created a different way of working on the seas. Once they had a ship, the pirates elected their captains, and made all their decisions collectively. They shared their bounty out in what Rediker calls “one of the most egalitarian plans for the disposition of resources to be found anywhere in the 18th century.”

They even took in escaped African slaves and lived with them as equals. The pirates showed “quite clearly – and subversively – that ships did not have to be run in the brutal and oppressive ways of the merchant service and the Royal navy.” This is why they were popular, despite being unproductive thieves.

The words of one pirate from that lost age – a young British man called William Scott – should echo into this new age of piracy. Just before he was hanged in Charleston, South Carolina, he said: “What I did was to keep me from perishing. I was forced to go a-pirating to live.”

In 1991, the government of Somalia – in the Horn of Africa – collapsed. Its 9 million people have been teetering on starvation ever since – and many of the ugliest forces in the Western world have seen this as a great opportunity to steal the country’s food supply and dump our nuclear waste in their seas.

Yes: nuclear waste. As soon as the government was gone, mysterious European ships started appearing off the coast of Somalia, dumping vast barrels into the ocean. The coastal population began to sicken. At first they suffered strange rashes, nausea and malformed babies. Then, after the 2005 tsunami, hundreds of the dumped and leaking barrels washed up on shore. People began to suffer from radiation sickness, and more than 300 died.

Ahmedou Ould-Abdallah, the U.N. envoy to Somalia, tells me: “Somebody is dumping nuclear material here. There is also lead and heavy metals such as cadmium and mercury – you name it.” Much of it can be traced back to European hospitals and factories, who seem to be passing it on to the Italian mafia to “dispose” of cheaply. When I asked Ould-Abdallah what European governments were doing about it, he said with a sigh: “Nothing. There has been no cleanup, no compensation and no prevention.”

At the same time, other European ships have been looting Somalia’s seas of their greatest resource: seafood. We have destroyed our own fish stocks by over-exploitation – and now we have moved on to theirs. More than $300 million worth of tuna, shrimp, lobster and other sea life is being stolen every year by vast trawlers illegally sailing into Somalia’s unprotected seas.

The local fishermen have suddenly lost their livelihoods, and they are starving. Mohammed Hussein, a fisherman in the town of Marka 100km south of Mogadishu, told Reuters: “If nothing is done, there soon won’t be much fish left in our coastal waters.”

This is the context in which the men we are calling “pirates” have emerged. Everyone agrees they were ordinary Somalian fishermen who at first took speedboats to try to dissuade the dumpers and trawlers, or at least wage a “tax” on them. They call themselves the Volunteer Coast Guard of Somalia – and it’s not hard to see why.

In a surreal telephone interview, one of the pirate leaders, Sugule Ali, said their motive was “to stop illegal fishing and dumping in our waters … We don’t consider ourselves sea bandits. We consider sea bandits [to be] those who illegally fish and dump in our seas and dump waste in our seas and carry weapons in our seas.” William Scott would understand those words.

No, this doesn’t make hostage-taking justifiable, and yes, some are clearly just gangsters – especially those who have held up World Food Program supplies. But the “pirates” have the overwhelming support of the local population for a reason. The independent Somalian news site WardherNews conducted the best research we have into what ordinary Somalis are thinking – and it found 70 percent “strongly supported the piracy as a form of national defense of the country’s territorial waters.”

One of the pirate leaders, Sugule Ali, said their motive was “to stop illegal fishing and dumping in our waters … We don’t consider ourselves sea bandits. We consider sea bandits [to be] those who illegally fish and dump in our seas and dump waste in our seas and carry weapons in our seas.”

During the revolutionary war in America, George Washington and America’s founding fathers paid pirates to protect America’s territorial waters, because they had no navy or coast guard of their own. Most Americans supported them. Is this so different?

Did we expect starving Somalians to stand passively on their beaches, paddling in our nuclear waste, and watch us snatch their fish to eat in restaurants in London and Paris and Rome? We didn’t act on those crimes – but when some of the fishermen responded by disrupting the transit corridor for 20 percent of the world’s oil supply, we begin to shriek about “evil.” If we really want to deal with piracy, we need to stop its root cause – our crimes – before we send in the gunboats to root out Somalia’s criminals.

The story of the 2009 war on piracy was best summarized by another pirate, who lived and died in the fourth century BC. He was captured and brought to Alexander the Great, who demanded to know “what he meant by keeping possession of the sea.” The pirate smiled and responded: “What you mean by seizing the whole earth; but because I do it with a petty ship, I am called a robber, while you, who do it with a great fleet, are called emperor.”

Once again, our great imperial fleets sail in today – but who is the robber?

Johann Hari is a writer for the Independent newspaper. He has reported from Iraq, Israel/ Palestine, the Congo, the Central African Republic, Venezuela, Peru and the U.S., and his journalism has appeared in publications all over the world. To contact him, email johann@johannhari.com [2] or visit his website at JohannHari.com [3]. This column previously appeared in the Independent and Huffington Post, where the following postscript was added:

Postscript: Some commentators seem bemused by the fact that both toxic dumping and the theft of fish are happening in the same place – wouldn’t this make the fish contaminated? In fact, Somalia’s coastline is vast, stretching 3,300km (over 2,000 miles). Imagine how easy it would be – without any coast guard or army – to steal fish from Florida and dump nuclear waste on California, and you get the idea. These events are happening in different places but with the same horrible effect: death for the locals and stirred-up piracy. There’s no contradiction.

URLs in this post:

[1] Image: http://www.sfbayview.com/wp-content/uploads/somali-pirates-seize-ship-101508.jpg

[2] johann@johannhari.com: mailto:johann@johannhari.com

[3] JohannHari.com: http://www.JohannHari.com

[4] Image: http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?sitename=San%20Francisco%20Bay%20View&siteurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sfbayview.com%2F&linkname=You%20are%20being%20lied%20to%20about%20pirates&linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sfbayview.com%2F2009%2Fyou-are-being-lied-to-about-pirates%2F

Okay… you really have to laugh at the irony of this one !! ~ CO Silverado

from:  http://www.opednews.com/populum/linkframe.php?linkid=87328

Posted: 04/09/09 04:20 PM [ET]
Michelle Obama planted an organic garden to promote fruits and vegetables as part of a healthy diet, but some chemical companies are worried it may plant a seed of doubt in consumers’ minds about conventionally grown crops.“Fresh foods grown conventionally are wholesome and flavorful yet more economical,” the Mid America CropLife Association (MACA) wrote the first lady last month a few days after she and fifth-graders from a local elementary school planted the White House Kitchen Garden.

The garden is designed to produce fresh fruits and vegetables for the first family and White House staff and guests. The garden itself doesn’t give the group heartburn. The letter also congratulates the first lady “on recognizing the importance of agriculture to America!”

But MACA, which represents agribusinesses like Monsanto, Dow AgroSciences and DuPont Crop Protection, is rather less thrilled about the fact that no chemicals will be used to grow the crops. The group is worried that the decision may give consumers the wrong impression about conventionally grown food.

“We live in a very different world than that of our grandparents. Americans are juggling jobs with the needs of children and aging parents,” the letter states. “The time needed to tend a garden is not there for the majority of our citizens, certainly not a garden of sufficient productivity to supply much of a family’s year-round food needs.”

The blog La Vida Locavore posted the letter last month.

Although pesticides or chemical fertilizers won’t be used on the White House garden, Camille Johnston, spokeswoman for the first lady, said Mrs. Obama wanted to plant the garden to promote the eating of fruits and vegetables as part of a healthy diet.

MACA members just want a little love pointed their way: “As you go about planning and planting the White House garden, we respectfully encourage you to recognize the role conventional agriculture plays in the U.S. in feeding the ever-increasing population, contributing to the U.S. economy and providing a safe and economical food supply.”

from http://metalsleasing.com/metals_leasing_explained.php

I was surprised to find that many silver and gold investors who had been buying the metals for many years still do not know what Metals Leasing is and why it is the single most bullish factor to own either Gold or Silver as 2009 begins.It is my opinion that the metals leasing program is about to unwind for both Gold and Silver and the price effect of this unwinding will be profound and instant.Silver stands as a much better candidate to Gold for reasons explained in this article, however gold will not be left out of the picture either.

Below is a simple, easy to read article on Silver Metals Leasing. In my opinion, metals leasing will play out differently for Gold than Silver, so this article focuses on the Silver aspect, given that it is consumed more and will, in my opinion, will surge much more than Gold as metals leasing unwinds.

Origins – The Bankers “Problem”

silver leasingLarge banks with huge stockpiles of Gold and Silver sitting in their vaults never earned any income from their bullion. After all, the metals intended function was to preserve wealth for the bank, not create it.Greed is a powerful force. Just “having” Gold and Silver wasn’t good enough for the major banks and they scratched their heads as to how they can bleed even more profit from their enterprises, in particular, how can they turn their Metal into money, without getting rid of their Metal!The big banks would never want to just sell their Gold and Silver reserves as it represents and backs their enterprise and is what instils faith in their organisation – but hey who says you can’t make some cash on the side, huh?

The Solution

Some smart banker from the banking Cartels, who no doubt got a promotion after coming up with the idea said “What if we lease the metals?buy silver bullionLease to the smaller banks for say, 1 or 2 percent per year on the value of the physical metal.This way we could earn more cash, while still keeping legal ownership over all our precious metal! Brilliant!

But why would other banks lease metal just to keep them in their vaults, I hear you ask? Good question… read on.

Crack Open Them Vaults!

Metals leasing was borne, and it was a huge success!The banking cartel opened their vaults and started delivering physical bullion to the smaller banks on lease contracts.And to answer your question from the previous paragraph – The smaller banks had no problem in paying 1-2% for the metals because they sold the metals into the open market and invested the cash into higher yielding assets (assets that paid more percentage points than what the metals were leased for in the first place).

silver investmentA major windfall for both the banking cartel who started earning money for leasing their otherwise stagnate assets, and the smaller banks loved the few percentage points they made risk free. Everyone happy right?

Before I continue, lets examine the specifics of this.

 

Silver and Gold are considered fungible. This means that if I lend you 1kg of pure gold, regardless of what happens with that bar of gold, silver inflationso long as you return ANY gold bar of equal weight, that is considered as good as the original one I lent. This is the only way metals leasing can work. No-one in their right mind would lease anything and then sell it into the open market if they had to get that exact same bar of metal back at the end of the lease.

 

 

By selling the metals from the big banks, there is the appearance of oversupply of silver and gold in the market. silver metals leasing scamAs will become evident later, this is a fake supply hitting the market, but the metals price depression is a real effect of this fake supply.

 

 

The banks who are leasing the Silver and Gold make guaranteed profit as the metals leasing cost (1-2%) is far below what they gold metals leasing scamcan make in the open market when they sell the bullion and invest in a 4-5% yielding asset (Government bonds, t-bills etc). When the metals lease expires, generally there is no reason to return the Metal (i.e. buy the metals back from the open market) – it makes more sense to roll the lease into another contract.

A Real Life Example

As a result of this leasing, the price of silver and gold are beaten down compared to where they should rightfully be.To see the effect of this leasing on the market, consider the following example.A Bank owns 500 houses in any given suburb. They then rent (lease) these houses out to tenants who, at the end of the contract promise to return the house or rollover into another rental contract.Now lets say that these 500 tenants decide to sell their rental houses, and invest the money made into other ventures (Yes, this is illegal for real-estate – but allowed for precious metals – go figure!).

silver price manipulationWhat would 500 houses being sold in that suburb do to the price of real-estate in that area? It would fall through the floor. The other houses in the area would be devalued to a large degree. This would also force other sales in the area as investors see the price of real-estate falling and get out of the market – creating a domino effect of plummeting house prices.

This same effect of a price suppression is seen on the price of both Gold and Silver. Through leasing – there is only a fake supply of metals on the market (remember the actual owner doesn’t want to sell the metal, that’s the whole reason why they are just leasing it out in the first place).

Some call this manipulation of the markets. I agree, but it also creates an opportunity like never before – read on.

Profits Galore

buy silver today
So back to leasing… the big banks making 1-2% on metals that were just sitting in their vault – they are happy. After all, the bullion being leased to the banks are recorded as assets of the bank as if it were still sitting in their vault – and at some stage will get them back (well, so they think!)The bullion and smaller banks are happy because they are making more money re-investing profits earned from the sale of the metal into the open market.Only the staunch silver investor is unhappy because he is seeing this fake supply of metals decimate his investment.Metals leasing is money in the bag for the banks for as long as the system is in place. But really, we all know that no-one gets a free ride in the long run – especially in the banking industry.Enron Style Accounting

silver manipulation
But isn’t these sales of silver and gold diminishing supplies and as such – wouldn’t the price rally on such a force?Well, here is where it starts to get a little shifty. The big central banks consider their lease contracts sold to smaller banks “as good as Gold or Silver” since, legally, they can call the lease in at any time or the bank doing the leasing and return the metal at the end of the lease.The banks have dealt with paper and computer electrons for so long, they forget they are dealing with a tangible asset and no paper trade could ever get the physical metal back into their vaults!So the big banks, when reporting their assets, count physical silver AND silver that is under lease as 1 line item… that is, even if 90% of a banks silver is out on loan, its still appears on the books as sitting in the vault!But what if the Silver cannot be returned – period?

Show Me The Metal!
silver bar
Here’s the gottchya point. The silver being leased, which is then sold, is gone and cannot be repaid. There is not enough silver above ground to account for the deficit on lease. It is estimated that a full 2 years supply of silver that is out “on loan” has been sold and used in our computers and electrical, our medical industry, our photography, our solar panels, our military equipment and a myriad of other products.You see, Silver (unlike gold) is not just horded for its intrinsic value – it is consumed – its gone baby.Now maybe the big banks didn’t realise just how much Silver would be used before starting to lease it out – or maybe they did but concluded that silver is in abundance and leasing makes sense (as was the case 3-4 decades ago).In 2009 however, there is no even 1 year supply of Silver above ground, yet there are 2 years supply of lease contracts needing to be returned. You do the math!

What’s the End-Game?
silver 2009 prediction
I’ve postured below how the end game may play out in Silver Metals Leasing. I cannot say it will play out the same for Gold, but it may. Here are the flags I think we’ll witness before Silver makes its mighty leap.Red Flag #1: The banks leasing the Silver will become concerned about hard inventory levels and the ability for repayment at some stage (its already too late however).Red Flag #2: In order to not create a run on Silver, they will gently increase the Silver lease rates over time as to not scare other banks into the realisation of the same problem they are witnessing. It’s important they do this relatively slowly… the last thing these lenders want is a run on Silver as it diminishes their chances of getting the physical back into the vault.Red Flag #3: As the lease rates increase, it doesn’t make sense to keep the monies earned from selling the Silver in the first place in the open market and lease contracts will not be rolled over.Red Flag #4: Metals will be bought back on market and delivered to the leasing banks.

Red Flag #5: As this starts to happen en masse, Comex and other Silver exchanges will default on delivery and at that time the cat is out of the bag and the Silver rush will ensue.

Lets look at what happened to the price of Nickel when Comex defaulted on that in 2006.

The price went from about $5 to $25 – 500% increase – and that for a non-precious, highly common metal with no physical world shortage.

There are other factors in the Silver market at play than were in play with Nickel…

As my other article illustrates, we have a worldwide shortage, not just one shortage in exchange. Comex will not be the first to default, infact it will be a catalyst for worldwide shortages as other warehouses are asked for delivery.

The US economy is already on tenterhooks. A precious metals shortage discovery would be just the ticket for mass liquidation of US dollars into stores of wealth such as Gold or Silver. We are already seeing this play out in fact… once entire nations start dumping US Dollars however, it’s a bleak outlook from then on.

The paper price of Silver will head towards zero. As most Silver investors are aware, places like comex trade 100’s of times more paper than what is in their Warehouses. These pieces of paper will approach their true value which is determined by the following formula

(Number of Available Contracts / Actual Inventory) * Market Value of Commodity.

If the actual inventory goes to zero – so to does the price. Do not trade Silver on paper and expect to benefit from the shortage, if anything a speculative SHORT is in play for paper.

Before these paper contract reach their value however, there may be a price burst to the upside before the realisation that paper is worthless. Personally, I won’t be speculating on paper at all during this time.

Inflationary concerns are real for the US Dollar. The Federal Reserve is committed to this “quantative easing” policy which Obama has already committed to allowing with his “stimulus” (read: printing) plans. This factor alone is causing precious metals to increase in paper money terms.

Mining is declining due to the recent bashing Silver has taken over the past 6 months. Most Silver is mined as a secondary metal (70% of production). As base metals decline (and they will further in my opinion – however that is not the scope of this article) Silver will continue to be less attractive. It is only after the price explosion coming where Silver will once again become VERY attractive to mine… but the deficit and immediate demand won’t stop the price going sky high in the interim.

With SO MANY factors at play, its impossible to put a price target for Silver. Anyone who does put a price target on Silver is doing so more for readability than truly understanding just how many factors are at play here.

I do believe however that Silver will be worth more than Gold at some point in time, if only for a short period of time.

John Christian.
January 1st. 2009.

Older Posts »