Feeds:
Posts
Comments

from http://www.pmex.net/forums/showthread.php?t=3142The continuation of the bank dominoes took 14 months, but it occurred. The initial destructive impact craters were carved in the United States and England. To be sure, major damage was done to assets in Spain and Greece and other smaller nations in the last year, but their banks had remained insulated. The discredit and death of the central bank franchise system showed first clear evidence in September 2008 on Wall Street. The unique mysterious aspect of banking systems is how they cannot be rebuilt once they turn insolvent. They rot in place, a process accelerated by rotten ethical values, euphemistically called moral hazard. To be sure, much so-called money flows through the dead rotten parts, but nothing becomes resuscitated except balance sheets. And besides, those balance sheets only look better due to accounting rules changes that deviate from mark to market (reality). The distortions magnify and turn cancerous. See the outsized mortgage bonds with no value at all. See the foreclosed homes withheld from the market for sale in bloated bank inventory. See the big bank balance sheets with large entries of idle money sitting in the US Federal Reserve. The dirtiest American secret in the banking world is not monetization of bonds. It is that US banks are deeply insolvent and would have suffered a worse fate in the last year if not for extortion from TARP funds as well as rescue funds coming from syndicate contraband accounts. See the Raw Story article and reference to the United Nations Office on Drugs & Crime (CLICK HERE).

INITIAL BANG

Focus on the bank impact craters, not the assets within those bank portfolios tied to bonds and properties. The US housing market turned down, and the mortgage finance bubble burst. The primary victims were Lehman Brothers, Fannie Mae, and AIG, which all died. Fannie and AIG remain in the Intensive Care located south of the Black Hole down yonder under the USGovt tent. To say they have not died is pure denial at best and stupidity at worst, since they continue to generate grandiose losses, as most rotting dead bodies do. The process is called advanced cadaver decomposition, accelerated by the wondrous financial engineering acid reflux. The tales of destruction in dead banks from the initial bang extended to the AngloSphere as Northern Rock, Royal Bank of Scotland, and HBOS effectively died. It remains to be seen if the venerable Lloyds is an empty shell prone and a cave-in also. Nevermind the details of the many death spirals. Focus on the dominoes and their sequential steps in magnificent wreckage. Marvel at the total lack of recognition by the official spokesmen for financial reality at the USDept Treasury, Wall Street analysts, London analysts, and European analysts. They never comment on sovereign debt insurance or default. Both are covered in the December Hat Trick Letter.

One must inquire why the blindness. The main reasons are many, but two stick out from the aerial view. The bank leaders and their supporting cast are attempting to accomplish the impossible. They strive to revive a dead entity, drained of structural integrity, lacking in motivation to function in capital formation, devoid of vibrant liquidity flow, and directly attached to the syndicate strongholds where the drain continues. They live and operate within their Dome of Fiat Perception, whose major layer is the Dome of American Perception. Unfortunately, those working within the American fence posts suffer the greatest blindness, the tragic effect of engrained arrogance after years of incredibly broad bully tactics and criminal abuse. For those sleepy brain-dead in denial of criminal abuse, a challenge. Just identify where the prosecutions are for multi-trillion dollar bond fraud in global export of toxic mortgage bonds and their derivative brethren, perpetrated by protected Wall Street firms! If one cannot identify, please sit down and be quiet, since clearly integrity was perhaps checked in at the corporate gate in exchange for a paycheck. Wall Street prefers to call the fraud mere errors of judgment. And a murder spree at a shopping mall is an firearms accident! A closer examination can detect continuity in the Treasury Secy post, and in the Securities & Exchange Commission, both still showing Wall Street pedigree. They strive to keep the lid on Wall Street legal matters, and do a great job.
 Central Bank Collapse Chart

DELAYED SECONG BANG

Finally, the harsh reality from the weight of gravity and the passage of time resulted in a second bang. One can always question the motivation of the Dubai World default, and the fact that it occurred when the USDollar was badly oversold. One can question the wisdom to attempt to force Abu Dhabi to cover the bad debts or assumptions that it would cover the bad debts. One can point to a hidden motive to ruin Iranian assets and trade routes, since they own 30% of Dubai properties and benefit from restricted product shipment through Dubai corporations. Regardless, the aerial view is most important. The biggest victims are the London and European banks heavily exposed to Dubai debt. The Powerz prefer to call it a rally on the USDollar from seeking the safety and security. But to the rotten ramparts of the US financial core? HARDLY!! Instead what happened was that the British Pound and Euro currency fell during an expected retreat after a realization of upcoming declared losses. The US has fortified a false front from accounting marked to fantasy that produced a stock rally and recent culmination in the most fraudulent Non-Farm Payroll report in modern history.

The November Jobs Report was dismantled in several pages of the Hat Trick Letter Macro Economic Report just posted, a grand convenient fiction. The easy dismissal has escaped the mainstream lapdog US press. It included Birth-Death Model fictional adjustments (gigantic for past revisions), constant unstable seasonal adjustments, to begin with. Dismissal included weak TrimTabs data, flagging USGovt tax revenue data, a surprise downturn in ISM service sector data, and still prevalent Challenger Gray & Christmas large site job cuts to make a mockery of the ballyhooed report. So the USDollar rally occurred, give them credit, since they needed it to avoid major losses upon the US$ DX futures option expiration. The Powerz got their onions squeezed in a vise and short hairs clipped on the gold futures options expiration three weeks ago, but they avoided a second massacre on the DX expiration last week. Now the US$ has stalled at the downtrend line.

The second bang was not so important in providing a lift in the Dead Man Walking Dollar, as it was in signaling a resumption in the dominoes. The central bank system has its next shock in store. The downgrades to government debt for Greece, Spain, and Portugal given last week by ratings agencies signal upcoming debt related earthquakes. In the United States, the game is known innocuously as Extend & Pretend. The Europeans are gifted in the same chicanery. The entire banking system in Spain has kept housing inventory, whether from foreclosures or ruined projects, at still elevated prices, stubbornly refusing to mark them down the necessary 30% or 50%. As a result, Spain has a wide gap between bid and offer, and a huge inventory sitting idle, a stalemate that leads to sinkholes.

THE NEXT BIG BANG

The second bang from Dubai is the most important destabilizing debt event in 14 months, but minimized in the United States. The US press hardly even mentions the downgrades across European on sovereign debt. The US press actually boasts that the financial markets are handling the Dubai situation very well, and might be past it already. What incredible denial, but much expected. The second bang signals the beginning of sovereign debt defaults, several of them, and the reshaping of Europe, both with the European Union and the Euro currency. The movement toward a Parliamentary European Union might soon be dead on arrival. The split of the Euro currency is soon to become a reality, a forecast made months before the Persian Gulf debt default forecast. The prudent action is to put the Lisbon Treaty on hold while member nations default on sovereign debt.

Spain’s Govt default will soon default. The reality of proper accounting for property writedowns and the corresponding bank debt losses will have a calamitous effect. Over 20% unemployment and the powerful recession in progress will ensure a Spanish Govt debt default. But the immediate fireworks are seen in Greece, where the Premier Papandreou has shown defiance. He will not permit the nation to undergo the mindless reckless coerced IMF restrictions and guidelines, with the workers of Greece suffering. The past record of such IMF strictures results in permanent crippling of nations, with too many precedents to fill a single page. Something very unusual comes to Greece in response to official defiance, something unprecedented yet powerful and unpleasant. Riots will return to Athens, with much greater force and intensity, and spread across Europe. But the spillover of emotions will lead to much bigger events. The momentum of Spanish and Greek defaults will kill the European Monetary Union, and thus the EU itself. The re-emergence of the Deutsche Mark is assured, except it will be called a variant of the Euro. The codenames to date are the Core Euro or the Nordic Euro. It will become the official currency of Germany and certain stronger Central Europe nations with a trade surplus. If France manages to be included in the Core, it will be a miracle and pure gift. The Germans will need squires to carry their bags, an expedient perhaps. Effects from the currency on trade export will leave France reeling but Germany struggling.

AFTERSHOCK BANGS

Once the cracks in Europe are broken wide open, the minor European nations will fall like flies trapped in a hot summer window. The Baltic States are weak and will no longer be carried. But the bigger and more visible tragedies will be seen in Eastern Europe. A curious malformation was constructed in recent years. The Eastern European nations attempted a reconstruction, with new industrial development. However, they went too far on the mortgage side, emulating Europe, England, and the United States. In doing so, they mixed in a deadly potion on the mortgage finance formula. The nations of Hungary, Poland, and Czech Republic used cheap Swiss funds in the mortgage funding, and will probably all default on sovereign debt. The base Swiss interest rate of 1.5% pumped money into Eastern European homes. Their local currencies each fell around 40% to 60%, making for a total disaster for Swiss bankers. Translated mortgage losses are in the 70% to 80% range. In fact Swiss bankers are struggling to achieve their equilibrium after deep damage in three aspects: toxic US bonds, devastating Eastern European mortgages, and threats to private bank accounts. The aftershock bangs to the Baltic States and Eastern Europe will set up a powerful additional event that will be seen as a climax.

CLIMAX TO EUROPEAN BANGS

At least one major European nation will suffer the ignominy of a sovereign default. By this time, Spain and Greece will have been wrecked, along with Portugal, possibly Italy also, and maybe even Ireland. The prime victims to close the process of sovereign debt default will include France and the United Kingdom. Considered untouchable, these nations will succumb to the wretched financial foundations that befall them. France unfortunately has too many similarities to Spain, which debtors cannot overlook any longer. The United Kingdom unfortunately has too many similarities to the United States, which debtors cannot overlook since the UK cannot print money like the Americans to buy more time, or draw upon clandestine sources of funds. The UK will run out of time. With the French and British defaults, the game goes ballistic and enters the TWILIGHT ZONE.

RUN ON THE USDOLLAR

Some might look at a dangerous run on the USDollar and a severe decline being the primary requirement for a rise in the gold price. It is true that for a long time the most heavily correlated factor for gold rising has been the US$ falling. A negative correlation has been vividly clear. More importantly though, a transition has begun in the last few months. The most important factor for gold has become, and will continue to be the falling value of the major currencies, all the major currencies, not only the USDollar. One must exclude the Japanese Yen in such an argument, since its 0% interest rate has rendered the Bank of Japan a neutered central bank. Watch the BOJ now, as it actually defends against profound damage from a rising Yen currency in the unprecedented process of an unwind to the grandest carry trade ever connected to financial engineering machinery. In fact, a handoff from the Yen Carry Trade to the Dollar Carry Trade is exactly what the USFed and USDept Treasury wish to interrupt. Never in history has a carry trade been installed to drain the vitality of the global reserve currency, to force and retain a near 0% interest rate, and to enable a continued falling value in the US$.

The most important factor for Gold, worth repeating, has become, and will continue to be the falling value of the major currencies. The entire gaggle of currencies is in deep trouble from government sponsored debasement. The entire gaggle of central banks is in deep trouble from discredit to their franchise system. Gold will rise in a powerful manner from the debasement of the major currencies, in particular the USDollar, the Euro, and the British Pound. The process of currency destruction will involve rotations. The events of the last month have shown that severe losses by London and European banks, from Dubai debt default, bring about an indirect lift in the USDollar. It occurred from a selloff of the British Pound and Euro currency, whose banks are lined up for new profound losses. The Powerz portrayed the Dubai events as a flight to security in the USDollar. If so, why is the long-term USTreasury Bond yield rising? The concept of retreating to a currency, the US$, with trillion$ federal deficits, an insolvent banking system, and an economy struggling under the weight of 25% homeowners insolvent on their home loans, IS TOTALLY LUDICROUS. Soon the counter concept of retreating from a currency into Gold will be better understood.

The next confusing events will probably bring about a decline in the Euro currency from imminent and actual default in at least two European Union member nation government debt securities. That is at least two European national sovereign debt defaults. The Euro should decline from such severe events, amidst uncertainty, at least initially. Later, when the European Monetary Union fractures with a shattering deafening blow, the new central core of the Euro currency will be revealed. When that historic event occurs, essentially the revival of the Deutsche Mark, the USDollar will resume its decline in a powerful manner. Gold will then rise in response powerfully in US$ terms. During the monetary earthquake with European government defaults, the gold price will rise powerfully in Euro terms. After the introduction of the new Core Euro currency, the gold price in Core Euro terms will stabilize, with a handoff given to the gold rally in US$ terms. Such will be the nature of the rotation phenomenon. Mainstream analysts will make errors all along the way to promote the false notion of flight to US$ safety and security, when none exists. A flight out of paper fiat currency is the key, and flight into Gold is the major mega-trend that has begun to occur and will continue to occur. Those naysayers might want to examine the gold accumulation by the major savers of the world, who happen to be the major creditors to the USGovt and thereby the major supporters to the USDollar, namely China. They plan to increase their gold holdings six-fold in the next several years. Central banks in aggregate have turned to accumulation in the last several months.

THE MAIN EVENT IS USTREASURY DEFAULT

No forecast invites more private anger, insults, dismissive comments, and generally negative email than my forecast made in autumn 2008 of a USTreasury Default. The climax of the string of global sovereign defaults will be the government debt default for the USGovt, in the USTreasurys. Events in the last year support the forecast. Federal deficits are rising dangerously, over a trillion$ annually. The Greenspan-Guidotti criterion for debt default has long ago been triggered, even assuming the USGovt OWNS ANY GOLD. It does not. Rather it owns clear ledger items called ‘Deep Storage Gold’ that is not deep in underground vaults, but deep in mountain ore deposits, not yet mined, kept very secretive. The short-term USGovt debt is over $2 trillion, closer to $3.5 trillion if immediate debt finance is counted, as in the next 12 months. The Stimulus Bill was a travesty, more wasted funds and opportunities. The TARP Fund was an $800 billion slush fund, clouded still in secrecy. The foreign wars are a sacred big money loser, with more deficits associated. The competent economists like former USFed Chairman Volcker warn that structural reform is non-existent in the USEconomy and financial sector. Volcker further warns that derivatives have done great harm, and contain no value, only a shift of financial rents. The Global Paradigm Shift is in full force since the spring months, led by the twin concepts of diversification out of US$-based reserves, and of the movement to establish an IMF basket currency as an alternative for international commerce and transaction settlement. The end of the US$ for crude oil sales has been written on the walls. The end to the US$ credit card with unlimited balance is soon to end.

Those people who act as naysayers, even to offer private criticism for the USTreasury Default forecast, seem never to grasp the above arguments, all of which have absolutely zero precedent. They did not foresee many important events, each of which were important Hat Trick Letter forecasts come true. 1) They did not foresee the insolvency of the US banking system. 2) They did not foresee the broader breakdown and wreckage in the mortgage finance industry beyond subprime. 3) They did not foresee the severe whacking to the British Pound. 4) They did not foresee the nationalization and insolvency of fraud ridden Fannie Mae. 5) They did not foresee the downturn and endless US housing bear market decline. 6) They did not foresee the heralded end of the Petro-Dollar, as in exclusive US$ usage for crude oil sales. 7) They did not foresee the Persian Gulf debt shock wave. In fact, they do not foresee anything except the sound of their own voices. THEY WILL NOT RECOGNIZE THE USTREASURY DEFAULT, MOST LIKELY TO COME AS A FORCED DEBT WRITEDOWN WITH DEEP CREDITOR LOSSES. We are in historically unprecedented times. Look for a new USDollar to be used inside the United States fence posts, since the USGovt does not control contracts conducted globally. The devaluation of the US$ will come full circle, and lead to an implosion internally.

TRIGGER EVENT, INSOLVENT USFED !!

The US Federal Reserve is under fire. Many in the USCongress wish to force audits of its balance sheet. Many in the USCongress wish to determine what it does with hundreds of billion$ in USGovt funds. Many citizens in the United States wish to understand its everyday operations and where its loyalty lies, let alone how it manages to fail at both its primary functions. Its defenders cannot come to grips with how the US$ has fallen over 98% in value since its inception. Its defenders cannot come to grips with how the USEconomy is stifled by near 20% unemployment (when those without work are counted). Its defenders cannot justify, or even permit true statistics, regarding the powerful monetization of US$-based official bonds. We are witnessing the Weimar-ization of the USFed and the USTreasury Bond and the USDollar. Once again, American economists ignore history, choose to rewrite it, and ignore the path leading to increasingly damaging cycles. This cycle is systemic, not a business cycle, not a credit cycle, and it contains a cliff much bigger and deeper. The train wreck in progress will culminate in a USTreasury Default.

Put aside the growing debt of the USGovt for a moment. Put aside the growing balance sheet of the USFed for a moment. Put aside the dogmatic belief that the USFed can print money to alleviate financial problems for a moment. Put aside the shifting sands notion that the USDollar will remain the safe haven for a moment. Instead, consider two important notions, monetization and balance sheet. The USFed has been monetizing USAgency Mortgage Bonds in the US credit market, in fact a colossal amount held by foreign central banks. The USFed has been monetizing USTreasury Bonds both by the domestic primary bond dealers, taking their unsold inventory merely one week after auctions. The cash value from foreign mortgage bonds serves as a monetization tool for foreign USTreasury bidding at the same auctions.

Lastly, just look at the USFed balance sheet and its ratio makeup. The USFed is bond buyer of last resort. In expanding its balance sheet, newly acquired assets have terrible quality. The USFed might actually be insolvent here & now due to rising mortgage bond purchases. Half their balance sheet is mortgage bonds. If they are worth just 6% less in true value, the USFed is broke. My conclusion is that the USFed is $100’s of billions in the red. Nobody seems to care, believing they can just print money and eliminate their insolvency. It aint that simple.

The US Federal Reserve is killing itself by massive purchases of badly impaired assets, often the toxic assets almost no banks or investors want. Sure, it is also debasing the USDollar in doing so. The most dangerous assets under heavy accumulation are the mortgage backed securities issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Demand for them is nonexistent. In the process the USFed has ruined its balance sheet. The ruin has occurred in just the last 12 months. Instead of acting in its historical role as the ‘lender of last resort’, the USFed has on its own expanded its mandate to become the ‘buyer of last resort.’ The end result is powerful, as they are a Substandard Junk Bond Warehouse. The destruction of the USFed balance sheet is apparent from the following chart with data, prepared by BusinessInsider.com. See the light blue Fed Agency Debt in the upper right, the cancer that grew upon their balance sheet. Their true value is an order of magnitude lower than book value maintained by the august body. This central bank is walking dead.

Credit Easing Policy Tools

Two major billboards must be written and read. 1) The USFed is insolvent. 2) The USFed is dangerously over-leveraged. According to its latest report, the US Federal Reserve owns over $1 trillion of mortgage backed securities, equal to 45.6% of the entire portfolio. One year ago mortgage backed securities were under 1% of its total assets. Actually the number was 0.6%, to make a 76-fold increase in toxic mortgage bond assets on the USFed balance sheet. The credit market actually believes the USFed stepped in and helped the system. But in doing so, they killed themselves. Just like other major banks such as the Wall Street firms, the USFed is very highly leveraged. The USFed carries $2157 billion of debt on $52.8 billion of capital, producing a leverage ratio of 40.8 to 1 ratio. Think over-leveraged, insolvent, and dead, but not yet declared dead. They might actually resign their commission contract with the USCongress, and thereby force a USTreasury Default!!

Here is where the insolvency risk screams out in obvious manner. Its listed mortgage bonds are 19 times greater than its capital, equal to 5.3% in inverse. So therefore, if the true value of these toxic assets is actually 6% lower than their recorded book value, the US Federal Reserve capital is depleted, effectively rendering it insolvent. It stands to reason that if Fannie Mae is insolvent, if Freddie Mac is insolvent, and if monetization supports their bonds, while the market shuns them, then the true value of the mortgage backed securities with their brand is less than 94.7% of their book value. Therefore one might safely conclude that on a strict accounting basis, the USFed is effectively insolvent. My simple guess is that the USAgency Mortgage Bonds on the official USFed balance sheet are worth perhap 30% to 50% less than cited on their books. That would leave the USFed insolvent by 15% to 25%.

One might wonder of motive for the USFed to offer big banks an interest yield on assets held on account. The reason might be to shore up its broken toxic balance sheet and fight off their own insolvency. The USFed remains liquid because banks continue to provide it with funding. Few if any questions come regarding the US Federal Reserve liabilities. The USFed is insolvent, just like the USGovt, just like the Social Security Trust Fund, just like the FDIC, just like US banks, just like US homeowners, and just like US leadership!!!

THE LEGITIMATE & TRUE SAFE HAVEN

That valid haven has been gold & silver for thousands of years. It will continue to be the safe haven. The major global currencies are being horribly debased as major governments fight off insolvent banking systems. In doing so, they have set up conditions for a string of sovereign debt default incidents. They will occur like a string of dominoes arranged in a global circle. The process was begun in the US and UK with broken banking systems and extraordinary measures to deal with it, like bank aid packages, stimulus packages, and liquidity facilities out the ying yang. The naive crowd thought the process ended when the US, UK, and Europe responded with official government rescues and aid, complete with certain nationalizations of key banks and financial institutions. Dubai defaults demonstrate the process continues for credit market crises. No climax has come, but the future holds plenty.

During the rotational lifts and fades of the major currencies, the one constant has been and will continue to be gold & silver. Notice today Tuesday December 15th, the Euro currency is down 130 basis points to the 145.3 area, but gold is flat on the day and silver is flat on the day, almost no change in each. Other warning signs remain, as the crude oil is back over the $70 mark and the 10-year USTNote yield has reached 3.6% in a recent rise. The so-called USDollar rebound has occurred with a rising long-term USTreasury yield, a contradiction for any claim of a flight to safe haven. The only lift for any US$ counter-trend rally come from walking atop the broken structures of other major currencies. The grand rotation during defaults will lift the Gold & Silver prices tremendously. Watch the back door vulnerability. As central banks and sovereign debt securities undergo a powerful unprecedented siege, their defense of the Gold-Dollar balance beam will vanish. British and European weakness does not translate to USDollar strength, not with destroyed finances for the USGovt and an insolvent balance sheet for the USFed. It instead translates to strength in the Gold & Silver bastions for monetary integrity.

THE HAT TRICK LETTER PROFITS IN THE CURRENT CRISIS.

The Golden Jackass

http://www.goldenjackass.com
The Golden Jackass – Great resource for articles and information about the economy, currency issues, The Federal Reserve, Precious Metals & more.

The Dollar Bubble

from http://inflation.us/unemploymentdeclineillusion.html

December 7, 2009

Unemployment Decline An Illusion, Financial System Collapse Ahead

On Friday it was announced by the Bureau of Labor Statistics that the U.S. unemployment rate in November declined from 10.2% to 10%. While the mainstream media would like you to believe we have seen a peak in unemployment and the worst of the economic crisis is behind us, we know that this dip in the unemployment number is phony and the recession is only beginning.

Although the unemployment number dipped in November, we still lost 11,000 nonfarm jobs. Unemployment fell by 0.2% only because the civilian labor force shrunk in November by 98,000 people. This means more people are becoming discouraged and giving up looking for jobs. When you combine both short and long-term discouraged workers who aren’t included in the labor force along with those who are underemployed with part-time jobs, real unemployment in the U.S. today is nearly 22%.

The most important area of employment to look at is manufacturing jobs. Increasing manufacturing is the only way for our country to truly recover and build real wealth, because it will allow us to cut down on inflation by exporting real products instead of the money we print. Unfortunately, the U.S. lost 41,000 manufacturing jobs in November and has lost 2.1 million manufacturing jobs over the last two years.

The main areas of increasing employment in November were health care and government jobs, which are non-productive jobs that are increasing global imbalances. These jobs are not being created due to a strengthening economy, they are being created due to our artificial, temporary and destructive stimulus. They are forcing our country to get deeper into debt and create massive inflation.

Those who receive a paycheck for a non-productive health care or government job, compete against all Americans for the purchasing of consumer goods, without an increase in the supply of goods. This means after excess inventories of goods are done being worked off, prices of all the goods we consume will increase at an astronomical rate that is unimaginable to most Americans today.

Many Americans with jobs are not concerned about inflation because they believe if the prices of goods go up, so will their wages and everything will balance out. They don’t understand our standard of living in America has already been declining for over a decade. Sure, we have plasma TV’s, cell phones and the Internet today, but our lives are becoming harder to live and it is becoming more difficult for the middle class to survive.

Twenty years ago, a father with an average job was able to support an entire family of four or five on one income. Today, both parents need to work, and they are still unable to support their family without getting deeply into debt with credit cards, mortgages, auto loans, and college loans. Less families today have health insurance. Wages have not kept pace with inflation, all we have seen is an increase in debt to meet some of the demand from inflation.

With the babyboomers beginning to retire, the decline in our standard of living is about to dreadfully accelerate. The average American peaks in spending at around 46 years old and the last babyboomer will turn 46 in 2010. Therefore, a major drop-off in consumer spending is coming. But more importantly, beginning this next decade, 1.5 to 2 million Americans will apply for Social Security every year until 2026, compared to only 500,000 per year during the last decade. Tax receipts are about to fall off a cliff, at the same time as government entitlement spending for Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid go through the roof.

Many people have been asking us on NIAnswers, if we see massive inflation and gold prices go through the roof like we predict, wouldn’t that be good for the U.S. because we have the largest gold reserves at 8,133.5 tonnes? Well, at the current gold price, our gold reserves are worth approximately $300 billion. Our budget deficit this year alone was $1.6 trillion. If we had to pay back our $12 trillion national debt using only the gold in our vaults, it would require a $45,889.44 per ounce gold price. But once you factor in our $55 to $100 trillion in unfunded liabilities for Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, our gold reserves will not put a dent in saving our country from the financial system collapse that lies ahead.

from http://inflation.us/silverbestinvestment.html

December 11, 2009

NIA Declares Silver Best Investment for Next Decade

We are less than three weeks away from entering the next decade. The most important thing you need to know entering 2010 is that silver is the single best investment for the next decade. In our opinion, investing into silver is the only sure way to tremendously increase your purchasing power over the next ten years.

Throughout world history, only ten times more silver has been mined than gold. If you go back about 1,000 years ago between the years 1000 and 1250, gold was worth ten times more than silver worldwide. From year 1250 to 1792, the gold to silver ratio slowly increased from 10 to 15 and the Coinage Act of 1792 officially defined a gold to silver ratio of 15. The ratio remained at 15 until forty-two years later when the ratio was increased in 1834 to 16, where it remained until silver was demonetized in 1873.

The gold to silver ratio remained between 10 and 16 for 873 years! It is only over the past 100 years that the gold to silver ratio has averaged 50. History will look back at the artificially high gold to silver ratio of the past century as an anomaly, caused by the dollar bubble and the world being deceived into believing that fiat currencies are real money, when in fact they’re all an illusion. Next decade, the fiat currency experiment will end badly in a currency crisis. The wealthiest people will be those who bought silver today and were smart enough to research and pick the best silver mining stocks.

While the vast majority of the gold ever produced remains sitting in vaults, 95% of the silver produced has been consumed by industry for thousands of applications in such tiny amounts that most of it will never be recycled and seen on the market again. Nobody knows the exact above ground supply of silver today, but most likely it is somewhere in the neighborhood of 1 billion ounces. That’s a total worldwide market value of only $17.4 billion, when the world has over $7 trillion in foreign currency reserves, mostly in fiat currencies that they will need to diversify out of due to rampant inflation.

Besides the fact that the world has been ignoring the monetary value of silver, silver prices are artificially low due to a large concentrated naked short position. It’s not a coincidence that the day silver reached its multi-decade high of over $21 per ounce in March of 2008, was the same day Bear Stearns failed. Bear Stearns was a holder of a massive short position in silver. In our opinion, this was likely a naked short position because there is nobody in the world who owns such a large amount of silver for Bear Stearns to have borrowed.

The reason why we believe the Federal Reserve was so eager to orchestrate a bailout of Bear Stearns, is because Bear Stearns was on the verge of being forced to cover their silver short position. Because the silver market is so small and tightly held, if Bear Stearns was forced to cover their short position, silver prices could’ve potentially rose to $50 per ounce or higher overnight. The world would’ve seen how economically unstable our country is and confidence in the U.S. dollar would’ve rapidly deteriorated.

JP Morgan still holds the silver short position they inherited from Bear Stearns. The concentrated naked short position in silver today is the largest short position in the history of all commodities, as a percentage of its market size. Eventually, JP Morgan will have to cover this short position or it could jeopardize their existence.

The best evidence that the short position in silver is naked and not backed by real silver, is the differential between what silver trades for on the Comex and what real people are willing to pay for physical silver on eBay. Every hour on eBay, there are dozens of one ounce silver coins selling for approximately $25. That’s about a 43% premium over the current spot price of silver. With so much demand for physical silver, we doubt the silver shorts in the paper market will be able to manipulate prices downward for much longer. A major short squeeze could be right around the corner and silver could take off in a way that shocks even those who are most bullish.

Stagecoach Bars available at Tea Party Silverby Allan Seccombe
November 13, 2009

ADVANCES in technology, increasing focus on reducing human interaction with bacteria, and tracking goods and people are all good news for silver and the price of the industrial metal, which has lagged for so long, says Jessica Cross, CEO of VM Group.

Long regarded as the poor cousin of gold, the metal, which is mainly used in industrial applications as well as to make jewelry, has bright prospects, with off take in a spectrum of new products put at just below 350 million ounces by 2020 (see graph below), Cross argued in a presentation at the LBMA Conference earlier this month.

The silver price is currently trading around $17.30/oz, (TP Note: at today’s pricing 11/23/09, make that $18.60 ± ) a level that it traded around in the first half of 2008 when it broke up to just shy of $21. These two spikes were unparalleled, certainly since 1985, with the metal touching slightly north of $8.50 just once since then.

 Looking at the history of the silver market, Cross said about two thirds of the mined metal is a by-product of other minerals like copper, gold and lead, making it difficult to determine a price at which silver production would fall in a natural supply and demand scenario. Being a by-product, the metal will come onto the market almost regardless what the price is for it.

One of the major users of silver, the photographic film sector, is being particularly hard hit as consumers turn to digital cameras. A graph of silver demand by the sector shows a steady decline since a peak above 200 million ounces in the early 1990s to well below 150 million ounces in 2009.

Another anchor on silver prices, which tend to take direction from the waxing and waning gold price, is that a lot of silver used in a range of applications – like photographic film, electronics and batteries — tends to be recycled, bringing back about 400 million ounces a year of the metal to the market.

But the days of huge recycling could be drawing to an end, Cross said, pointing to a host of technological advances needing silver, including wound care, food hygiene and water, wood preservatives, textiles, solar panels and radio frequency identification tags.

“These new end uses for silver are set to pick up the demand slack left by the shrinking photographic industry,” she said. “But, unlike photographic film, these end users do not generate vast amounts of recycled metal. In general… the metal is going to be taken off the market for good.”

Silver’s time has come, she said.

“The change is coming about as a result of silver’s unique properties as a biocide as well as is superior conductivity,” she said.

“The interesting thing is that many of the world’s worries and woes today are playing right into the hands of silver and this metal appears to be in the right place at the right time in a number of applications.”

Radio frequency identification tags, used in identity documents, passports and stock controls, are growing in use. China, for example is spending $6B to install these devices in identity documents for all its citizens and in transport tickets, she said.

London-based metals consultancy VM Group estimates use of these tags will grow to more than 30 billion by 2020 from around seven billion now. Each tag contains about 10 milligrams of silver on average, absorbing nine million ounces of silver from the 2.3 million ounces currently.

Solar panels and mirrors could absorb another 50 million ounces by 2020 compared to 18 million ounces now. Wood preservative coatings could account for up to 100 million ounces a year as chromate copper arsenic, the existing wood preservative is phased out.

There were no estimates of the amount of silver that could be used in plasters and bandages, which use silver for its anti-bacterial properties. These properties also feed into the clothing and textile sector where body odors and bacteria are eliminated.

Silver is also used in water purification devices and to store food. It could take up around 95 million oz by 2020.

“Superimpose this good news on the tonnages of silver that have gone into the ETFs (silver-backed exchange-traded funds) and you have an underlying strength within this market to justify its current price strength,” Cross said.

The gold:silver ratio is expected to narrow. At current prices you can buy 64.4 ounces of silver for the price of a single ounce of gold.

“The current market conditions indicate that gold has become overpriced and silver has become underpriced, suggesting there will be a shift in assets from gold to silver,” said Jeffrey Lewis, who edits Silver-coin-investor.com.

 “Since 1970, the ratio of the number of ounces of silver you could buy with one ounce of gold has run as high as 80:1 and as low as 20:1, with a mean of 54:1. Today’s ratio is moderately higher than 54:1; in fact, the ratio is nearing 64:1, suggesting that there will be a correction in either the price of gold, or silver will advance to make up the deficit,” he said.

US Mint Suspends Sale of 2009 Gold & Silver Eagles
Mary Beth at Tea Party silver
November 29, 2009
 

If, like me, you have been watching the spot price of gold and silver lately you would be seeing that your investments in silver have been growing. One of the first things I do every morning is check the spot prices… Naturally, this is something I need to keep on top of throughout the day so that TPS can keep our pricing structure current… but as a fellow silver investor and co-owner now of a gold mining operation, I have a vested interest in watching what is going on.
 

In the last week we’ve seen gold almost reach the $1200 mark… and silver came close to $19. The first thing that this triggers in my mind is the question: “Okay… What’s happening out there?” This, then prompts me to go digging for articles, research, commentary by the experts to tell me what has impacted the pricing spikes or drops (as the case may be). Much of what I discover in this process I bring to the TP Newsletter to keep YOU informed …
 

One of the things that happened this week is that the US Mint has suspended the sale of gold and silver American Eagles. Several people have called me to ask about this. But, before I go further though let me pontificate a little about the issue of numismatic values compared to investment values of precious metals, because this will have a bearing on understanding the rest of this article.
 

Numismatics, according to Wikipedia, is “is the study or collection of currency, including coins, tokens, paper money, and related objects.” So when we speak of ‘numismatic value’ we aren’t necessarily only talking about precious metals.
 

Numismatic values are driven by many factors besides the metal content itself. The following is a list of some of those factors: 

  • Year of production
  • Design quality
  • Condition of the coin/currency at the time of valuation (circulated, uncirculated, scratches, dents, dings, corrosion etc.)
  • Minting errors
  • Socio-political events
  • Rarity
  • Quality – proof or burnished

Any or all of these factors can drive up the cost /value of a coin/currency from a collector’s vantage point. Contrast this from an investor’s vantage point. An investor is looking to purchase a commodity of value at the lowest possible cost with the highest possible value to hold until it increases in value, or is able to be leveraged in some way to his/her advantage. In the case of precious metals as one such commodity, the numismatic issues listed above are of little consequence because

  1. They drive up the costs artificially and  
  2. The value of the metal itself as a commodity is what is important.

Having said that, however, the investor market still holds room for personal preference as to design features and other meanings specific to investor preferences.

So let’s move on to discussing what’s going on with the US Mint. Keep in mind that the Gold and Silver Eagles are Legal Tender (howbeit greatly undervalued with a face value of $1 for silver and $50 for gold).1. As a government institution, the US Mint production of silver and gold products is dependent upon the annual allocation by the Treasury of precious metals purchased under their annual budget. This is a fixed, finite, amount (contrary to private mints or commercial entities that just purchase more when they run out).

  

In the last 2 years, 2008, & 2009, the US Treasury allocated LESS silver / gold than in previous years to their Silver Eagles program. This has several implications:

  • Silver/Gold Eagles for these years will be rarer than in previous years.
  • With current investment demand being higher due to the economic climate, there will be shortages.
  • The US Mint sales currently top 25,000,000 for 2009.
  • Because of the shortages, the short-term pricing will carry a higher premium (over spot). This is basic market economics.

2. In 2008, the US Mint also had to suspend sales of the gold & silver American Eagles. I had just begun investing in them in the fall of 2008… and I ran into this very issue myself last year. (Remember, the Treasury had cut back supply of metals in 2008 as well.)

3. Just because the US Mint has suspended sales does NOT mean that you cannot obtain these coins elsewhere from sellers who have had the foresight to stock up or vendors who are resellers for the US mint. But, bear in mind the following:

  • Buyers will pay a higher premium
  • Buyers will find they may have to wait extended periods of time for delivery after paying for their coins.

The US Mint may produce a few more of the 2009 Eagles yet before the close of the year. On the other hand, they may just be trying to regulate the rate at which they deplete the remaining supply. Since we are approaching the end of 2009, this isn’t too alarming because 2010 is just around the corner; new allocations for the next year will be in place and they will begin minting the 2010 Silver and Gold American Eagles and the cycle begins again.

I do have a source of limited supply for circulated Silver American Eagles from time to time. These will have scratches or small dings, and perhaps need cleaning up if you want to get them in pristine shape… But the premiums are lower and they’re still Eagles if you’re a real American Eagles fan… If you’re interested, drop me a note and I’ll watch for the next stock available in these…

I do still have sources for obtaining Eagles after our current inventory is depleted; however, I, too, will be subject to these higher premiums; so if and when that time comes, I may need to decide not to carry them due to the price point we will have to charge for them. After all, my mindset is more of an investor than collector… and I will want to keep as much of the commodity on hand as possible and not waste precious resources on artificially inflated premiums. Having said that, if you still want Eagles, drop me a note or call, and I’ll be happy to see what I can do… generally speaking, however, know that there will probably be minimum order volumes imposed upon me by my vendors…generally, those are 500 or more coins.

Things to Come for Tea Party Silver

On another note… I’ve shared with you in the past that we will be minting a new 1 Troy oz, .999 fine silver divisible bar (similar to the Stagecoach bars we now carry) … we are still in waiting mode on this, but I will give you a sneak preview of the artwork… I had hoped these would be ready for Christmas, but it doesn’t look like we’re going to make production in time. I will definitely be sending out a note when they come off the production line. Our first run will be in silver; later in the year after we get supply of gold running from the mine, we intend to produce these in 1 oz gold as well.This design is obviously inspired by our Alaska mining venture, but also takes its text from Zechariah 13:9 in Scripture.

“This third I will bring into the fire; I will refine them like silver and test them like gold. They will call on my name and I will answer them; I will say, ‘They are my people,’ and they will say, ‘The LORD is our God.’” 

We felt this text brings together the concept of how adversity distills character as well as references the challenges we are all facing in these turbulent times, which many believe to be ‘last days’ scripture talks about. We also felt that it instills hope in what the future holds and a sense of direction that we need to be taking as individuals and as a country.

Contact us at silver@teapartysilver.org
888-203-2232 x 1

from http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=13701

Global Research, May 22, 2009
US Association of Physicians calls for Moratorium on GMO Foods

 The American Academy of Environmental Medicine (AAEM) has just issued a call for an immediate moratorium on Genetically Manipulated (GMO) Foods.

In a just-released position paper on GMO foods, the AAEM states that ‘GM foods pose a serious health risk’ and calls for a moratorium on GMO foods. Citing several animal studies, the AAEM concludes ‘there is more than a casual association between GMO foods and adverse health effects’ and that ‘GM foods pose a serious health risk in the areas of toxicology, allergy and immune function, reproductive health, and metabolic, physiologic and genetic health.’ The report is a devastating blow to the multibillion dollar international agribusiness industry, most especially to Monsanto Corporation, the world’s leading purveyor of GMO seeds and related herbicides.

 In a press release dated May 19, the American Academy of Environmental Medicine, which describes itself as ‘an international association of physicians and other professionals dedicated to addressing the clinical aspects of environmental health,’ called immediately for the following emergency measures to be taken regarding human consumption of GMO foods:

   * A moratorium on GMO food; implementation of immediate long term safety testing and labelling of GMO food.

    * Physicians to educate their patients, the medical community and the public to avoid GMO foods.

    * Physicians to consider the role of GMO foods in their patients’ disease processes.

    * More independent long term scientific studies to begin gathering data to investigate the role of GMO foods on human health.

 The AAEM chairperson, Dr Amy Dean notes that ‘Multiple animal studies have shown that GM foods cause damage to various organ systems in the body. With this mounting evidence, it is imperative to have a moratorium on GM foods for the safety of our patients’ and the public’s health.’ The President of the AAEM, Dr Jennifer Armstrong stressed that ‘Physicians are probably seeing the effects in their patients, but need to know how to ask the right questions. The most common foods in North America which are consumed that are GMO are corn, soy, canola, and cottonseed oil.’ The AAEM’s position paper on Genetically Modified foods can be found at http:aaemonline.org.

 The paper further states that Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) technology ‘abrogates natural reproductive processes, selection occurs at the single cell level, the procedure is highly mutagenic and routinely breeches genera barriers, and the technique has only been used commercially for 10 years.’

The AAEM paper further states, ‘several animal studies indicate serious health risks associated with GM food consumption including infertility, immune dysregulation, accelerated aging, dysregulation of genes associated with cholesterol synthesis, insulin regulation, cell signalling, and protein formation, and changes in the liver, kidney, spleen and gastrointestinal system.’

They add, ‘There is more than a casual association between GM foods and adverse health effects. There is causation as defined by Hill’s Criteria in the areas of strength of association, consistency, specificity, biological gradient, and biological plausibility. The strength of association and consistency between GM foods and disease is confirmed in several animal studies.’

 GMO is toxic

The AAEM paper should give grounds for official rethinking of the current quasi laissez faire regulatory stance to GMO in which the solemn word of the GMO seed companies such as Monsanto is regarded as scientifically valid proof of safety. The AAEM study is worth citing in detail in this regard:

‘Specificity of the association of GM foods and specific disease processes is also supported. Multiple animal studies show significant immune dysregulation, including upregulation of cytokines associated with asthma, allergy, and inflammation.  Animal studies also show altered structure and function of the liver, including altered lipid and carbohydrate metabolism as well as cellular changes that could lead to accelerated aging and possibly lead to the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Changes in the kidney, pancreas and spleen have also been documented. A recent 2008 study links GM corn with infertility, showing a significant decrease in offspring over time and significantly lower litter weight in mice fed GM corn. This study also found that over 400 genes were found to be expressed differently in the mice fed GM corn. These are genes known to control protein synthesis and modification, cell signalling, cholesterol synthesis, and insulin regulation. Studies also show intestinal damage in animals fed GM foods, including proliferative cell growth and disruption of the intestinal immune system. ‘

The AAEM study also reviewed the biotechnology industry claims that GMO foods can feed the world through production of higher crop yields. It cited contrary evidence that the opposite appeared to be true, namely that over time GMO harvest yields were lower than conventional yields and required over time, more not less, highly toxic herbicidal chemicals such as glyphosate. The report noted, ‘The several thousand field trials over the last 20 years for genes aimed at increasing operational or intrinsic yield (of crops) indicate a significant undertaking. Yet none of these field trials have resulted in increased yield in commercialized major food/feed crops, with the exception of Bt corn.’ However, the slight yield gain for Bt corn they report was ‘largely due to traditional breeding improvements,’ and not to GMO.

They conclude that because GMO foods ‘pose a serious health risk in the areas of toxicology, allergy and immune function, reproductive health, and metabolic, physiologic and genetic health and are without benefit, the AAEM believes that it is imperative to adopt the precautionary principle, which is one of the main regulatory tools of the European Union environmental and health policy and serves as a foundation for several international agreements. The most commonly used definition is from the 1992 Rio Declaration that states: ‘In order to protect the environment, the precautionary approach shall be widely applied by States according to their capabilities. Where there are threats of serious or irreversible damage, lack of full scientific certainty shall not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation.’

Under intense public pressure, the German Minister of Agriculture recently issued a prohibition of planting for Monsanto MON810 GMO corn. Unfortunately, two weeks later she permitted planting of GMO potato seeds. Amflora, a genetically modified potato manufactured by chemicals giant BASF (a joint venture GMO partner of Monsanto), was declared by the German Ministry as posing ‘no danger for human health or the environment,’ The Ministry cited ‘in-depth examination’ and talks with scientific and economic experts as basis for the reckless decision.

The publication of the sensational critique of GMO by the American Academy of Environmental Medicine has been greeted with stone silence by most major US media and international press.

 GMO politics

 As I describe in great detail in my book, Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation, , GMO was released on the general public in the early 1990’s in the USA under an executive decision by then President George Herbert Walker Bush, reportedly following closed door meetings with leading Monsanto executives. President Bush mandated that there should be no special health and safety tests done by any US Government agency before releasing GMO for food consumption. It came to be known as the Doctrine of Substantial Equivalence.

 The US Government, on urging of Monsanto and the GMO lobby, further decided that labelling of a food product as ‘GMO free’ should be prohibited, using the vaguely formulated and entirely unscientific ‘doctrine’ proclaimed by President Bush in 1992, namely that GMO plants and non-GMO or ordinary plants were ‘substantially equivalent’ and hence needed no special testing before being released to the public.

 That Substantial Equivalence Doctrine, despite the fact that it directly contradicts the demand of the GMO companies for exclusive patent rights to their GMO seeds as being ‘unique’ and different from ordinary seeds, enabled Monsanto, Dow Chemicals, DuPont and other GMO patent holders to proliferate their products with no control. Most Americans naively believe that the Government Food and Drug Administration and US Department of Agriculture are there to make certain industrial food products are confirmed fully safe for human and for animal consumption before licensing.

 That de facto prohibition on labelling GMO foods has meant that most Americans have no idea how much of their daily diet from store-bought Corn Flakes to soybeans to corn and additives in every food on the supermarket shelf contained GMO contamination.

 Coincident with the mass introduction of GMO into the human and animal diet in the United States beginning the end of the 1990’s, there have been reported epidemic levels of allergic outbreaks in humans, strange diseases and numerous other health issues. The fact it is forbidden by Federal law to label GMO products means most health professionals are not even aware there might be any connection to a GMO diet for millions of Americans. The US population, since the 1992 ruling of President Bush—a ruling reaffirmed by presidents Clinton, George W. Bush and now by Barack Obama and his pro-GMO Secretary of Agriculture, Tom Vilsack—has been in effect treated as human guinea pigs in mass experimentation for substances never independently proven in long-term (ten years or longer) studies to be safe.    

It remains to be seen if the scientific critique of the AAEM is given the attention it warrants.

 

This is an interview w/ Adrian Douglas of http:.//www.marketforceanalysis.com and he is also the director of GATA. His work is proprietary and it measures the supply and demand in a particular market. The reading is the “force” for that market. The vast majority of the interview concerned Gold and Silver and in great detail. Adrian made some very interesting comments about Silver towards the end…

See video at http://www.thefinancialtube.com/video/3551/Interview-with-Adrian-Douglas-marketforceanalysiscom

Gold to $1650

Alf Fields tells Jim Sinclair: Gold to $1650
Posted by: “kevin” kevin.mckern@gmail.com spacerkev
Fri May 22, 2009 7:38 am (PDT)

From Yahoo Group “InvestorsExchange”

I bring to you the following with the specific permission of Alf Fields. I have suggested to you often in the past that once the price of gold reaches into its maximum potential it will not repeat the fall of the 1980s. I foresee gold re-entering the system in a new and unique form that does not include convertibility. It will not be tied to interest rates as it once was in its previous form. I have written to you various times about the Federal Reserve Gold Certificate ratio, modernized and revitalized, which now may well be associated with an SDR form of an International Central Bank. The tie between the ratio and gold would be a measure of international liquidity considered zero or 100 on the day of adoption.

The following is Alf’s statement yesterday, with his permission to post: “Gold cannot decline from its highs as it will be incorporated into the national and international monetary systems at that time.” –Alf Fields, May 20, 2009

Now do you have any questions why Fund Wizard Paulson just got long a few billion dollars worth of Gold ETFs and a few major gold producers? Finally a major event has taken place that is a US dollar milestone. The financing and extremely important event is the arrangement between China and Brazil displaces the dollar as China becomes the major trading partner with Brazil. Since then the Rial has been celebrating and the dollar has been depressed. This is a once in approximately a century replacement of a trading currency that has always meant a dethronement of the deposed and coronation of a new currency king. The last time this happened was when the US dollar supplanted the British Pound as the major trading currency and entity with Brazil 79 years ago. It took the Brits 300 years to supplant the Portuguese Escudo with the British Pound. Only twice has this occurred in 379 years. This is obscure to most but not to Mr. Paulson the hedge wizard. Obscure to most, but not to our gang at JSMineset. The dollar died in Rio and that means everywhere.\ The dollar is in for a very cold winter. There is one thing that is absolutely certain and that is Gold is now headed to at least $1650 and in all probability much higher. This is happening NOW! What more do you need to know?

from http://www.sfbayview.com/2009/you-are-being-lied-to-about-pirates/

by Johann Hari

Somali pirate “ships” are small, but the ships they seize are huge. They held one gigantic tanker for months until ransom was paid.

Who imagined that in 2009, the world’s governments would be declaring a new War on Pirates? As you read this, the British Royal Navy – backed by the ships of more than two dozen nations, from the U.S. to China – is sailing into Somalian waters to take on men we still picture as parrot-on-the-shoulder pantomime villains. They will soon be fighting Somalian ships and even chasing the pirates onto land, into one of the most broken countries on earth.

 

But behind the arrr-me-hearties oddness of this tale, there is an untold scandal. The people our governments are labeling as “one of the great menaces of our times” have an extraordinary story to tell – and some justice on their side.

Pirates have never been quite who we think they are. In the “golden age of piracy” – from 1650 to 1730 – the idea of the pirate as the senseless, savage thief that lingers today was created by the British government in a great propaganda heave. Many ordinary people believed it was false: Pirates were often rescued from the gallows by supportive crowds. Why? What did they see that we can’t?

In his book “Villains of All Nations,” the historian Marcus Rediker pores through the evidence to find out. If you became a merchant or navy sailor then – plucked from the docks of London’s East End, young and hungry – you ended up in a floating wooden Hell. You worked all hours on a cramped, half-starved ship, and if you slacked off for a second, the all-powerful captain would whip you with the cat o’ nine tails. If you slacked consistently, you could be thrown overboard. And at the end of months or years of this, you were often cheated of your wages.

Pirates were the first people to rebel against this world. They mutinied against their tyrannical captains – and created a different way of working on the seas. Once they had a ship, the pirates elected their captains, and made all their decisions collectively. They shared their bounty out in what Rediker calls “one of the most egalitarian plans for the disposition of resources to be found anywhere in the 18th century.”

They even took in escaped African slaves and lived with them as equals. The pirates showed “quite clearly – and subversively – that ships did not have to be run in the brutal and oppressive ways of the merchant service and the Royal navy.” This is why they were popular, despite being unproductive thieves.

The words of one pirate from that lost age – a young British man called William Scott – should echo into this new age of piracy. Just before he was hanged in Charleston, South Carolina, he said: “What I did was to keep me from perishing. I was forced to go a-pirating to live.”

In 1991, the government of Somalia – in the Horn of Africa – collapsed. Its 9 million people have been teetering on starvation ever since – and many of the ugliest forces in the Western world have seen this as a great opportunity to steal the country’s food supply and dump our nuclear waste in their seas.

Yes: nuclear waste. As soon as the government was gone, mysterious European ships started appearing off the coast of Somalia, dumping vast barrels into the ocean. The coastal population began to sicken. At first they suffered strange rashes, nausea and malformed babies. Then, after the 2005 tsunami, hundreds of the dumped and leaking barrels washed up on shore. People began to suffer from radiation sickness, and more than 300 died.

Ahmedou Ould-Abdallah, the U.N. envoy to Somalia, tells me: “Somebody is dumping nuclear material here. There is also lead and heavy metals such as cadmium and mercury – you name it.” Much of it can be traced back to European hospitals and factories, who seem to be passing it on to the Italian mafia to “dispose” of cheaply. When I asked Ould-Abdallah what European governments were doing about it, he said with a sigh: “Nothing. There has been no cleanup, no compensation and no prevention.”

At the same time, other European ships have been looting Somalia’s seas of their greatest resource: seafood. We have destroyed our own fish stocks by over-exploitation – and now we have moved on to theirs. More than $300 million worth of tuna, shrimp, lobster and other sea life is being stolen every year by vast trawlers illegally sailing into Somalia’s unprotected seas.

The local fishermen have suddenly lost their livelihoods, and they are starving. Mohammed Hussein, a fisherman in the town of Marka 100km south of Mogadishu, told Reuters: “If nothing is done, there soon won’t be much fish left in our coastal waters.”

This is the context in which the men we are calling “pirates” have emerged. Everyone agrees they were ordinary Somalian fishermen who at first took speedboats to try to dissuade the dumpers and trawlers, or at least wage a “tax” on them. They call themselves the Volunteer Coast Guard of Somalia – and it’s not hard to see why.

In a surreal telephone interview, one of the pirate leaders, Sugule Ali, said their motive was “to stop illegal fishing and dumping in our waters … We don’t consider ourselves sea bandits. We consider sea bandits [to be] those who illegally fish and dump in our seas and dump waste in our seas and carry weapons in our seas.” William Scott would understand those words.

No, this doesn’t make hostage-taking justifiable, and yes, some are clearly just gangsters – especially those who have held up World Food Program supplies. But the “pirates” have the overwhelming support of the local population for a reason. The independent Somalian news site WardherNews conducted the best research we have into what ordinary Somalis are thinking – and it found 70 percent “strongly supported the piracy as a form of national defense of the country’s territorial waters.”

One of the pirate leaders, Sugule Ali, said their motive was “to stop illegal fishing and dumping in our waters … We don’t consider ourselves sea bandits. We consider sea bandits [to be] those who illegally fish and dump in our seas and dump waste in our seas and carry weapons in our seas.”

During the revolutionary war in America, George Washington and America’s founding fathers paid pirates to protect America’s territorial waters, because they had no navy or coast guard of their own. Most Americans supported them. Is this so different?

Did we expect starving Somalians to stand passively on their beaches, paddling in our nuclear waste, and watch us snatch their fish to eat in restaurants in London and Paris and Rome? We didn’t act on those crimes – but when some of the fishermen responded by disrupting the transit corridor for 20 percent of the world’s oil supply, we begin to shriek about “evil.” If we really want to deal with piracy, we need to stop its root cause – our crimes – before we send in the gunboats to root out Somalia’s criminals.

The story of the 2009 war on piracy was best summarized by another pirate, who lived and died in the fourth century BC. He was captured and brought to Alexander the Great, who demanded to know “what he meant by keeping possession of the sea.” The pirate smiled and responded: “What you mean by seizing the whole earth; but because I do it with a petty ship, I am called a robber, while you, who do it with a great fleet, are called emperor.”

Once again, our great imperial fleets sail in today – but who is the robber?

Johann Hari is a writer for the Independent newspaper. He has reported from Iraq, Israel/ Palestine, the Congo, the Central African Republic, Venezuela, Peru and the U.S., and his journalism has appeared in publications all over the world. To contact him, email johann@johannhari.com [2] or visit his website at JohannHari.com [3]. This column previously appeared in the Independent and Huffington Post, where the following postscript was added:

Postscript: Some commentators seem bemused by the fact that both toxic dumping and the theft of fish are happening in the same place – wouldn’t this make the fish contaminated? In fact, Somalia’s coastline is vast, stretching 3,300km (over 2,000 miles). Imagine how easy it would be – without any coast guard or army – to steal fish from Florida and dump nuclear waste on California, and you get the idea. These events are happening in different places but with the same horrible effect: death for the locals and stirred-up piracy. There’s no contradiction.

URLs in this post:

[1] Image: http://www.sfbayview.com/wp-content/uploads/somali-pirates-seize-ship-101508.jpg

[2] johann@johannhari.com: mailto:johann@johannhari.com

[3] JohannHari.com: http://www.JohannHari.com

[4] Image: http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?sitename=San%20Francisco%20Bay%20View&siteurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sfbayview.com%2F&linkname=You%20are%20being%20lied%20to%20about%20pirates&linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sfbayview.com%2F2009%2Fyou-are-being-lied-to-about-pirates%2F

Okay… you really have to laugh at the irony of this one !! ~ CO Silverado

from:  http://www.opednews.com/populum/linkframe.php?linkid=87328

Posted: 04/09/09 04:20 PM [ET]
Michelle Obama planted an organic garden to promote fruits and vegetables as part of a healthy diet, but some chemical companies are worried it may plant a seed of doubt in consumers’ minds about conventionally grown crops.“Fresh foods grown conventionally are wholesome and flavorful yet more economical,” the Mid America CropLife Association (MACA) wrote the first lady last month a few days after she and fifth-graders from a local elementary school planted the White House Kitchen Garden.

The garden is designed to produce fresh fruits and vegetables for the first family and White House staff and guests. The garden itself doesn’t give the group heartburn. The letter also congratulates the first lady “on recognizing the importance of agriculture to America!”

But MACA, which represents agribusinesses like Monsanto, Dow AgroSciences and DuPont Crop Protection, is rather less thrilled about the fact that no chemicals will be used to grow the crops. The group is worried that the decision may give consumers the wrong impression about conventionally grown food.

“We live in a very different world than that of our grandparents. Americans are juggling jobs with the needs of children and aging parents,” the letter states. “The time needed to tend a garden is not there for the majority of our citizens, certainly not a garden of sufficient productivity to supply much of a family’s year-round food needs.”

The blog La Vida Locavore posted the letter last month.

Although pesticides or chemical fertilizers won’t be used on the White House garden, Camille Johnston, spokeswoman for the first lady, said Mrs. Obama wanted to plant the garden to promote the eating of fruits and vegetables as part of a healthy diet.

MACA members just want a little love pointed their way: “As you go about planning and planting the White House garden, we respectfully encourage you to recognize the role conventional agriculture plays in the U.S. in feeding the ever-increasing population, contributing to the U.S. economy and providing a safe and economical food supply.”

from http://metalsleasing.com/metals_leasing_explained.php

I was surprised to find that many silver and gold investors who had been buying the metals for many years still do not know what Metals Leasing is and why it is the single most bullish factor to own either Gold or Silver as 2009 begins.It is my opinion that the metals leasing program is about to unwind for both Gold and Silver and the price effect of this unwinding will be profound and instant.Silver stands as a much better candidate to Gold for reasons explained in this article, however gold will not be left out of the picture either.

Below is a simple, easy to read article on Silver Metals Leasing. In my opinion, metals leasing will play out differently for Gold than Silver, so this article focuses on the Silver aspect, given that it is consumed more and will, in my opinion, will surge much more than Gold as metals leasing unwinds.

Origins – The Bankers “Problem”

silver leasingLarge banks with huge stockpiles of Gold and Silver sitting in their vaults never earned any income from their bullion. After all, the metals intended function was to preserve wealth for the bank, not create it.Greed is a powerful force. Just “having” Gold and Silver wasn’t good enough for the major banks and they scratched their heads as to how they can bleed even more profit from their enterprises, in particular, how can they turn their Metal into money, without getting rid of their Metal!The big banks would never want to just sell their Gold and Silver reserves as it represents and backs their enterprise and is what instils faith in their organisation – but hey who says you can’t make some cash on the side, huh?

The Solution

Some smart banker from the banking Cartels, who no doubt got a promotion after coming up with the idea said “What if we lease the metals?buy silver bullionLease to the smaller banks for say, 1 or 2 percent per year on the value of the physical metal.This way we could earn more cash, while still keeping legal ownership over all our precious metal! Brilliant!

But why would other banks lease metal just to keep them in their vaults, I hear you ask? Good question… read on.

Crack Open Them Vaults!

Metals leasing was borne, and it was a huge success!The banking cartel opened their vaults and started delivering physical bullion to the smaller banks on lease contracts.And to answer your question from the previous paragraph – The smaller banks had no problem in paying 1-2% for the metals because they sold the metals into the open market and invested the cash into higher yielding assets (assets that paid more percentage points than what the metals were leased for in the first place).

silver investmentA major windfall for both the banking cartel who started earning money for leasing their otherwise stagnate assets, and the smaller banks loved the few percentage points they made risk free. Everyone happy right?

Before I continue, lets examine the specifics of this.

 

Silver and Gold are considered fungible. This means that if I lend you 1kg of pure gold, regardless of what happens with that bar of gold, silver inflationso long as you return ANY gold bar of equal weight, that is considered as good as the original one I lent. This is the only way metals leasing can work. No-one in their right mind would lease anything and then sell it into the open market if they had to get that exact same bar of metal back at the end of the lease.

 

 

By selling the metals from the big banks, there is the appearance of oversupply of silver and gold in the market. silver metals leasing scamAs will become evident later, this is a fake supply hitting the market, but the metals price depression is a real effect of this fake supply.

 

 

The banks who are leasing the Silver and Gold make guaranteed profit as the metals leasing cost (1-2%) is far below what they gold metals leasing scamcan make in the open market when they sell the bullion and invest in a 4-5% yielding asset (Government bonds, t-bills etc). When the metals lease expires, generally there is no reason to return the Metal (i.e. buy the metals back from the open market) – it makes more sense to roll the lease into another contract.

A Real Life Example

As a result of this leasing, the price of silver and gold are beaten down compared to where they should rightfully be.To see the effect of this leasing on the market, consider the following example.A Bank owns 500 houses in any given suburb. They then rent (lease) these houses out to tenants who, at the end of the contract promise to return the house or rollover into another rental contract.Now lets say that these 500 tenants decide to sell their rental houses, and invest the money made into other ventures (Yes, this is illegal for real-estate – but allowed for precious metals – go figure!).

silver price manipulationWhat would 500 houses being sold in that suburb do to the price of real-estate in that area? It would fall through the floor. The other houses in the area would be devalued to a large degree. This would also force other sales in the area as investors see the price of real-estate falling and get out of the market – creating a domino effect of plummeting house prices.

This same effect of a price suppression is seen on the price of both Gold and Silver. Through leasing – there is only a fake supply of metals on the market (remember the actual owner doesn’t want to sell the metal, that’s the whole reason why they are just leasing it out in the first place).

Some call this manipulation of the markets. I agree, but it also creates an opportunity like never before – read on.

Profits Galore

buy silver today
So back to leasing… the big banks making 1-2% on metals that were just sitting in their vault – they are happy. After all, the bullion being leased to the banks are recorded as assets of the bank as if it were still sitting in their vault – and at some stage will get them back (well, so they think!)The bullion and smaller banks are happy because they are making more money re-investing profits earned from the sale of the metal into the open market.Only the staunch silver investor is unhappy because he is seeing this fake supply of metals decimate his investment.Metals leasing is money in the bag for the banks for as long as the system is in place. But really, we all know that no-one gets a free ride in the long run – especially in the banking industry.Enron Style Accounting

silver manipulation
But isn’t these sales of silver and gold diminishing supplies and as such – wouldn’t the price rally on such a force?Well, here is where it starts to get a little shifty. The big central banks consider their lease contracts sold to smaller banks “as good as Gold or Silver” since, legally, they can call the lease in at any time or the bank doing the leasing and return the metal at the end of the lease.The banks have dealt with paper and computer electrons for so long, they forget they are dealing with a tangible asset and no paper trade could ever get the physical metal back into their vaults!So the big banks, when reporting their assets, count physical silver AND silver that is under lease as 1 line item… that is, even if 90% of a banks silver is out on loan, its still appears on the books as sitting in the vault!But what if the Silver cannot be returned – period?

Show Me The Metal!
silver bar
Here’s the gottchya point. The silver being leased, which is then sold, is gone and cannot be repaid. There is not enough silver above ground to account for the deficit on lease. It is estimated that a full 2 years supply of silver that is out “on loan” has been sold and used in our computers and electrical, our medical industry, our photography, our solar panels, our military equipment and a myriad of other products.You see, Silver (unlike gold) is not just horded for its intrinsic value – it is consumed – its gone baby.Now maybe the big banks didn’t realise just how much Silver would be used before starting to lease it out – or maybe they did but concluded that silver is in abundance and leasing makes sense (as was the case 3-4 decades ago).In 2009 however, there is no even 1 year supply of Silver above ground, yet there are 2 years supply of lease contracts needing to be returned. You do the math!

What’s the End-Game?
silver 2009 prediction
I’ve postured below how the end game may play out in Silver Metals Leasing. I cannot say it will play out the same for Gold, but it may. Here are the flags I think we’ll witness before Silver makes its mighty leap.Red Flag #1: The banks leasing the Silver will become concerned about hard inventory levels and the ability for repayment at some stage (its already too late however).Red Flag #2: In order to not create a run on Silver, they will gently increase the Silver lease rates over time as to not scare other banks into the realisation of the same problem they are witnessing. It’s important they do this relatively slowly… the last thing these lenders want is a run on Silver as it diminishes their chances of getting the physical back into the vault.Red Flag #3: As the lease rates increase, it doesn’t make sense to keep the monies earned from selling the Silver in the first place in the open market and lease contracts will not be rolled over.Red Flag #4: Metals will be bought back on market and delivered to the leasing banks.

Red Flag #5: As this starts to happen en masse, Comex and other Silver exchanges will default on delivery and at that time the cat is out of the bag and the Silver rush will ensue.

Lets look at what happened to the price of Nickel when Comex defaulted on that in 2006.

The price went from about $5 to $25 – 500% increase – and that for a non-precious, highly common metal with no physical world shortage.

There are other factors in the Silver market at play than were in play with Nickel…

As my other article illustrates, we have a worldwide shortage, not just one shortage in exchange. Comex will not be the first to default, infact it will be a catalyst for worldwide shortages as other warehouses are asked for delivery.

The US economy is already on tenterhooks. A precious metals shortage discovery would be just the ticket for mass liquidation of US dollars into stores of wealth such as Gold or Silver. We are already seeing this play out in fact… once entire nations start dumping US Dollars however, it’s a bleak outlook from then on.

The paper price of Silver will head towards zero. As most Silver investors are aware, places like comex trade 100’s of times more paper than what is in their Warehouses. These pieces of paper will approach their true value which is determined by the following formula

(Number of Available Contracts / Actual Inventory) * Market Value of Commodity.

If the actual inventory goes to zero – so to does the price. Do not trade Silver on paper and expect to benefit from the shortage, if anything a speculative SHORT is in play for paper.

Before these paper contract reach their value however, there may be a price burst to the upside before the realisation that paper is worthless. Personally, I won’t be speculating on paper at all during this time.

Inflationary concerns are real for the US Dollar. The Federal Reserve is committed to this “quantative easing” policy which Obama has already committed to allowing with his “stimulus” (read: printing) plans. This factor alone is causing precious metals to increase in paper money terms.

Mining is declining due to the recent bashing Silver has taken over the past 6 months. Most Silver is mined as a secondary metal (70% of production). As base metals decline (and they will further in my opinion – however that is not the scope of this article) Silver will continue to be less attractive. It is only after the price explosion coming where Silver will once again become VERY attractive to mine… but the deficit and immediate demand won’t stop the price going sky high in the interim.

With SO MANY factors at play, its impossible to put a price target for Silver. Anyone who does put a price target on Silver is doing so more for readability than truly understanding just how many factors are at play here.

I do believe however that Silver will be worth more than Gold at some point in time, if only for a short period of time.

John Christian.
January 1st. 2009.

from http://www.borntoexplore.org/mercury_poisoning_and_adhd.htm
Mercury has been contaminating our environment for years.  The two largest sources of mercury in the environment are coal-fired power plants and municipal waste incinerators which burn consumer products containing mercury (like some of the toys found in Rice Krispies).  Mercury is a metallic element that cannot be broken down by any method, and it is unusual for a metal because it is liquid at room temperature and evaporates very quickly when heated.   Mercury escapes readily up the smokestack and is spread widely by winds before it falls to earth.  There, it is bioconcentrated in the fatty tissue of animals, just like PCBs and DDT.  This is especially true in fish that are higher up in the food chain, like tuna or swordfish.  Most states in the U.S. have inland fish advisories because of widespread mercury contamination.    The contamination of tuna is particularly worrisome because some people eat a lot of it.
Mercury is a well-known neurological poison that causes all the symptoms of ADHD, such as hyperactivity and poor concentration.  Ironically, fish oil contains essential fatty acids that are crucial for proper brain function — deficiencies of omega-3 fatty acids have been linked with ADHD.  Yet, in a catch-22, an increase in fish consumption may lead to brain damage from mercury poisoning.
What you can do: Children and women who may become pregnant or who are nursing should be very careful about what types and how much fish they eat.  Consumer Reports recommends no more than 3 oz of tuna per week, based on US EPA assessments.  Because of influence by the tuna industry, the U.S. Federal Government has been slow to publish tuna advisories, with the very first advisory made in the spring of 2004.  That advisory recommends no more than 6 oz of tuna per week. Bear in mind that the official advisory is based on a political compromise between science and the tuna industry.  I’d go with the Consumer Reports recommendation of 3 oz.  They also recommend that children and pregnant women not eat Albacore at all, because it has higher levels of mercury.
If you routinely eat locally caught freshwater fish, contact your regional or state environmental protection agency to find out how safe the fish in your area are to eat, but most states in the US have some kind of advisory out.   The concentration of mercury varies quite a bit by species, so that top predator species like bass will have higher levels of mercury than sunfish.  Oily fish tends to have more mercury than other species, because the mercury binds to the oil, yet the oil is what makes fish otherwise very healthy to eat. Sardines and farm-raised salmon are oily fish that have lower levels of mercury and are safer to eat.   The fatty acids found in fish oil are very healthy, so keep eating fish, just be sure to eat the right kinds! 
Other types of fish to avoid: king mackeral, shark, swordfish and tilefish.
Consumer Reports lists alternatives to tuna that have lower levels of mercury.  I’ll list these in increasing order of mercury:  clams, oysters, pickerel, shrimp, whiting, salmon, tilapia, sardines, freshwater trout, anchovies, catfish, flounder, mullet, scallops, sole, blue/king/snow crab, pollock, American shad, squid, and whitefish.  Fish sticks and typical fish sandwiches are OK.
Kellogg’s Rice Krispies, Now with Mercury!
rice krispies box back.jpg (108199 bytes)The frustrating aspect of mercury poisoning is the flippant attitude by U.S. corporations about the use of mercury, even as government agencies try to eliminate the use of it.   A case in point is Kelloggs, which in 2004 has been putting mercury-containing toys in each box of Rice Krispies.  I only know this because my home state of Connecticut recently required all consumer products containing mercury to be labeled.  Connecticut has some of the highest fallout rates of mercury in the nation, partly because most of our waste is incinerated.   The official goal in Connecticut is to eliminate the use of mercury in household products.  

mercury warning.bmp (169254 bytes)

Thanks to Kelloggs, I now have three cheezy Spiderman toys which I’m not supposed to throw away in the trash. Instead I’m supposed to save them until my town has a household hazardous waste day, which is once a year.  I can’t even take the batteries out of the toys (the mercury is contained in the batteries), because the access screws have a triangular head.  So I have to save the toys in their entirety.   Then, my town has to pay for the disposal of these toys. Mercury cannot be recycled from batteries.  mercury toy.bmp (2153166 bytes)Therefore, the batteries, and the whole toy really, must be secured in a hazardous waste landfill for all eternity.  This is all for something I didn’t even want and didn’t realize I was buying — I thought I was buying CEREAL, not mercury-containing toys!   Plus, there will be extra mercury in our environment because I know perfectly well that most of these toys will end up in the trash incinerator, and the mercury will go right up the stack. 
kelloggs warning.jpg (13988 bytes)
So why did Kellogg’s use mercury-containing batteries, anyway?  Because they last a really long time, which is obviously really critical in a disposable toy for young children who get bored with each toy after about 20 minutes.    Button batteries containing mercury are understandable for hearing-aides (which is what they’re mostly used for) or even watches, but disposable toys?  How frivolous can you get?  There are button batteries out there without mercury. C’mon Kelloggs!  Use some common sense and get some ethics. 
I emailed Kelloggs about this and they dismissed my complaint (below) and continued to ship thousands of boxes containing these toys to Connecticut and everywhere else.
 
merc-spiderman toy.jpg (79300 bytes)Dear Ms. Gallagher:
Thank you for contacting our company.
Responding to your concerns, may I assure you that the Spider-man 2 (TM) Spidey-Signal toy is approved for children of all ages and does not present a hazard to your family or a food quality concern to your product. The statement “Battery in toy contains mercury, dispose of properly,” has been included to comply with State of Connecticut legislation regarding all products containing mercury and Connecticut’s battery disposal legislation. The button cell battery in this toy is typical of retail batteries sold in many toy products. For more information on the State of Connecticut labeling and disposal requirements, visit http://www.dep.state.ct.us/wst/mercury/mercury.htm
I hope this will respond to your concerns and reassure you of our good faith in this regard.
We appreciate your interest in our promotions and products.
Sincerely,
Cathy
Consumer Specialist
Consumer Affairs Department
MAB/cl
006062707A
Kellogg North America
PO Box CAMB
Battle Creek, MI 49016-1986

 

 
___________________________
Update
I’m not the only one who took offense at Kellogg’s:
 

Connecticut Attorney General’s Office

Press Release

Attorney General Asks Kellogg Company To Immediately
Remove Spider-Man Toy From Cereal Boxes

June 30, 2004

Attorney General Richard Blumenthal today sent a letter to Kellogg Company, urging them to immediately stop selling cereal boxes that include a Spider-Man toy that contains batteries with mercury. Even in small amounts, mercury is toxic and poses a significant health and environmental hazard.
The Spider-Man toy – dubbed “Spidey-Signal” – can be wrapped around a child’s wrist, and projects a web-shaped light. And the toy comes with the ominous warning: “Battery in toy contains mercury, dispose of properly.” The battery is not easily removable and not replaceable. The toy recently debuted in specially marked Kellogg’s cereal boxes, including Frosted Flakes and Rice Krispies, in anticipation of today’s Spider-Man 2 movie premiere.
Connecticut’s Mercury Reduction Act and the Child Protection Act establish a clear public policy against the use of mercury and other hazardous substances in children’s toys. Kellogg’s use of mercury batteries in cereal boxes may constitute a violation of unfair or deceptive trade practices under state law. Blumenthal also urges any supermarket, or other business that sells these products, to immediately remove products containing these toys from shelves.
“No healthy breakfast begins with mercury,” Blumenthal said. “Clear, common sense law in Connecticut bans mercury from most consumer products – and all children’s toys – because it is so highly toxic. The health risks are real and immediate, particularly to children, if the batteries are damaged or dismantled, or disposed of improperly.”
“Mercury dangers cannot be sugarcoated. Mercury-free batteries are easily available. Kellogg should remove all cereal boxes containing toys with mercury batteries from store shelves immediately. If it fails to stop selling this product, we will take prompt action. We will inform the stores of their legal obligations and seek their cooperation.”
Click here to read the Letter to the Kellogg Company

from http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/270101

South African farmers suffered millions of dollars in lost income when 82,000 hectares of genetically-manipulated corn (maize) failed to produce hardly any seeds.The plants look lush and healthy from the outside. Monsanto has offered compensation.

Monsanto blames the failure of the three varieties of corn planted on these farms, in three South African provinces,on alleged ‘underfertilisation processes in the laboratory”. Some 280 of the 1,000 farmers who planted the three varieties of Monsanto corn this year, have reported extensive seedless corn problems.

Urgent investigation demanded
However environmental activitist Marian Mayet, director of the Africa-centre for biosecurity in Johannesburg, demands an urgent government investigation and an immediate ban on all GM-foods, blaming the crop failure on Monsanto’s genetically-manipulated technology.

Willem Pelser, journalist of the Afrikaans Sunday paper Rapport, writes from Nelspruit that Monsanto has immediately offered the farmers compensation in three provinces – North West, Free State and Mpumalanga. The damage-estimates are being undertaken right now by the local farmers’ cooperative, Grain-SA. Monsanto claims that ‘less than 25%’ of three different corn varieties were ‘insufficiently fertilised in the laboratory’.

80% crop failure
However Mayet says Monsanto was grossly understating the problem.According to her own information, some farms have suffered up to 80% crop failures. The centre is strongly opposed to GM-food and biologically-manipulated technology in general.

“Monsanto says they just made a mistake in the laboratory, however we say that biotechnology is a failure.You cannot make a ‘mistake’ with three different varieties of corn.’

Demands urgent government investigation:
“We have been warning against GM-technology for years, we have been warning Monsanto that there will be problems,’ said Mayet. She calls for an urgent government investigation and an immediate ban on all GM-foods in South Africa.

Of the 1,000 South African farmers who planted Monsanto’s GM-maize this year, 280 suffered extensive crop failure, writes Rapport.

Monsanto’s local spokeswoman Magda du Toit said the ‘company is engaged in establishing the exact extent of the damage on the farms’. She did not want to speculate on the extent of the financial losses suffered right now.

Managing director of Monsanto in Africa, Kobus Lindeque, said however that ‘less than 25% of the Monsanto-seeded farms are involved in the loss’. He says there will be ‘a review of the seed-production methods of the three varieties involved in the failure, and we will made the necessary adjustments.’

He denied that the problem was caused in any way by ‘bio-technology’. Instead, there had been ‘insufficient fertilisation during the seed-production process’.

And Grain-SA’s Nico Hawkins says they ‘are still support GM-technology; ‘We will support any technology which will improve production.’ see

He also they were ’satisfied with Monsanto’s handling of the case,’ and said Grain-SA was ‘closely involved in the claims-adjustment methodology’ between the farmers and Monsanto.

Farmers told Rapport that Monsanto was ‘bending over backwards to try and accommodate them in solving the problem.

“It’s a very good gesture to immediately offer to compensate the farmers for losses they suffered,’ said Kobus van Coller, one of the Free State farmers who discovered that his maize cobs were practically seedless this week.

“One can’t see from the outside whether a plant is unseeded. One must open up the cob leaves to establish the problem,’ he said. The seedless cobs show no sign of disease or any kind of fungus. They just have very few seeds, often none at all.

The South African supermarket-chain Woolworths already banned GM-foods from its shelves in 2000. However South African farmers have been producing GM-corn for years: they were among the first countries other than the United States to start using the Monsanto products.

The South African government does not require any labelling of GM-foods. Corn is the main staple food for South Africa’s 48-million people.

The three maize varieties which failed to produce seeds were designed with a built-in resistance to weed-killers, and manipulated to increase yields per hectare, Rapport writes.

Older Posts »